Connect with us

Companies

The Gig Economy Is Facing A Crackdown – ShareCafe

Published

on

In 2004, Dynamex Operations West, a California-based courier company, suddenly reclassified its permanent full-time employees as independent contractors, depriving them of entitlements such as minimum wages, overtime and paid sick days. The reclassified drivers had to use their own vehicles and pay for all expenses to earn a contracted delivery fee that amounted to a wage cut.

Two drivers fought back. A putative class action began in 2005 that last year prompted California’s supreme court to make it harder to classify workers as independent contractors. To categorise staff as such, a company must show a person is “free from (its) control”, works “outside” its core operations and has an “independently established trade, occupation or business”. In September, the Democrat-controlled government of California wrote these tests into law under Assembly Bill 5.

AB5, as it is known, which exempts many types of independent contractors, is of significance because a dispute within a traditional business is serving as a means to attack the employment model of the ‘gig economy’ companies that didn’t exist when the Dynamex dispute began. These are the online labour marketplaces that match people to short-term jobs, or ‘gigs’ that employ up to 7% of workforces in the US and Australia.

To admirers, the giganomics labour model lets people operate remotely, set flexible hours, work for multiple employers and promote their services via ratings. Many gig workers are no doubt happy with their earnings and conditions and the broader opportunities they have to find work. But to critics, the gig model weakens worker rights and conditions and undercuts wages, thus further tilts the labour market in capital’s favour. Another criticism is that the gig labour model allows platforms to skirt regulatory controls when they move beyond the tech industry – think how app-based companies have upset transportation by bypassing regulations.

For all its happy customers and no doubt many willing and well-paid workers, giganomics is vulnerable politically because it comes with five social costs. The first is that giganomics can harm established competitors in non-tech industries that are bound by regulations that gig companies can ignore. The second is the gig economy can hurt government finances through lost taxes and higher welfare payments. Third, the spread of gigging is blamed for reducing worker income and making it more insecure. Stemming from that are the fourth and fifth costs; lower and less-stable income weakens the consumption that drives economies and deepens the inequality centred on stagnant wages and record profits that is roiling politics across the developed world.

These drawbacks are prompting a regulatory and worker-based backlash against the gig economy that might only be getting started. More US states are preparing laws similar to AB5 and California and other states are looking at ways to help independent contractors unionise and bargain collectively. The result could be some solution whereby gig workers are afforded better pay and some protections while keeping their flexibility. At the same time, the scrutiny of the gig economy could broaden into a push back against contracting and outsourcing more generally to ensure the rising number of workers who lack permanent full-time employment status enjoy a fairer and more secure share of today’s riches.

To be sure, the gig labour market is here to stay. Efforts to tame the model could flounder. The push against gigging in the US is largely restricted to states where the Democrats are in power. Car-booking companies could succeed in overturning California’s law because it could boost their labour bills by 30%. A jump in jobless rates would impede efforts to help workers. No sure-fire proof exists that gigging has suppressed wages share in output, or even that app-based companies have increased the percentage of independent contractors in the US workforce.

But the zeitgeist focused on inequality says otherwise. Giganomics is disruptive enough to promote a counterattack, especially when many allege that gigging tilts the labour market further against workers at a time when profits are at record levels.

For the full version of this article and to view sources, go to: magellangroup.com.au/insights/

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Companies

GIG Car Share Chooses the Ridecell Platform for its Expansion into Seattle

Published

on

By

The United States’ Largest Free-Floating Car Share Company Uses the Ridecell Mobility Platform to Easily Track Inventory, Rent Vehicles and Automate Operations

SAN FRANCISCO, July 8, 2020 /PRNewswire/ — Ridecell Inc., the leading platform provider for shared mobility operators, today announced that GIG Car Share, powered by AAA Northern California, will use the Ridecell High-yield Mobility Platform for its expansion to Seattle. Gig already uses Ridecell for its other operating cities, including Sacramento and the San Francisco Bay Area. The Ridecell platform enables Gig to operate its fleet efficiently while giving members a frictionless experience, including quick reservation on the Gig app plus keyless entry and Gig free parking locator within the app. Ridecell also keeps track of cars for easy service, cleaning and return, minimizing downtime and maximizing profitability.

Gig Seattle will begin with 250 brand new Toyota Prius XLE hybrid cars that seat five comfortably and provide outstanding fuel efficiency. The Ridecell platform provides Gig with end-to-end automation, instant driver verification, payment processing, on-demand scheduling, and custom analytics. In addition, the platform tracks vehicle locations to ensure safety and speedy service when needed.

“Gig has grown to be the largest* free-floating car sharing service in the country, despite the tough times most transportation services are facing,” said Aarjav Trivedi, CEO of Ridecell. “Gig’s great customer service orientation combined with our platform, has helped the company continue to succeed where other companies have faltered. We’re proud to continue our partnership with them as they enter the Seattle market.”

Ridecell offers the world’s only end-to-end platform for all types of mobility, including car sharing, ridehailing, and short-term vehicle subscriptions. The platform is designed to create high-yield mobility businesses for greater profitability. For more information, visit www.ridecell.com

About Ridecell

Ridecell helps companies build and operate profitable mobility businesses. With the company’s High-yield Mobility™ SaaS toolkit of intelligent software, business services, and ecosystem partners, Ridecell customers maximize three key profit drivers: customer experience, fleet utilization, and operational efficiency.

Founded in 2009, today, Ridecell powers some of the most successful mobility services in cities across Europe and North America. These services include ZITY from Ferrovial and Groupe Renault, Gig Car Share from AAA Northern California, and Blu Smart EV ride sharing service.

Ridecell is headquartered in San Francisco, California, with more than 170 employees in offices across the globe.

About GIG Car Share
GIG Car Share, a service from AAA Northern California, is the largest free-floating car share in the nation.* In three years, Gig has grown to more than 65,000 members and operates more than 1,000 cars across Northern California (Oakland, Berkeley, San Francisco, Sacramento) and Seattle, Washington. The service launched in 2017 as the first venture from A3Ventures, AAA’s innovation lab based in Berkeley, Calif. Learn more at gigcarshare.com.

*Based on the size of its fleet as of 6/1/2020

Media Contact:
Jane Gideon
Tel: 415-682-9292
Email: press@ridecell.com

View original content to download multimedia:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/gig-car-share-chooses-the-ridecell-platform-for-its-expansion-into-seattle-301089501.html

SOURCE Ridecell Inc.

Source link

Continue Reading

Companies

GEA, GIG Karasek (Dr. Aichhorn Group), Buss-SMS-Canzler, Swenson Technology, Technoforce – Bandera County Courier

Published

on

By

The report on the Global Circulation Evaporators Market features detailed insights and deep research. The report introduces the important factors which driving the growth of the global Circulation Evaporators market, untapped opportunities for the manufacturers, current trends, and developments shaping the global Circulation Evaporators market and other factors across various key segments.

In addition, report highlights the market drivers, future opportunities and restraints which impacting the growth of the global Circulation Evaporators market. Along with these, report also provides the changing trends which are directly and indirectly influence the market are also analyzed and incorporated in the report to gives the detailed information related to the market which resulting for better decision making.

The study encompasses profiles of major companies operating in the Circulation Evaporators Market. Key players profiled in the report includes:
GEA
GIG Karasek (Dr. Aichhorn Group)
Buss-SMS-Canzler
Swenson Technology
Technoforce
SPX Flow
Vobis, LLC
Artisan Industries
LCI Corporation
3V Tech
Chem Process Systems
SSP Pvt Limited.
TMCI Padovan
Hebeler Process Solutions
Zhejiang Tanlet Machinery
Wenzhou CHINZ Machinery
Shanghai Joy Light Industry Machinery

Available Sample Report in PDF Version along with Graphs and Figures@  https://www.innovateinsights.com/report/global-circulation-evaporators-market-2020-industry-analysis-size/256587/#requestsample

By the product type, the market is primarily split into:
Natural Circulation Evaporators
Forced Circulation Evaporators

By the end-users/application, this report covers the following segments:
Chemical Industry
Food and Beverages
Environmental Industry
Pharmaceuticals
Others

 Market, By regions:
– North America (U.S., Canada, Mexico)
– Europe (U.K., France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Central & Eastern Europe, CIS)
– Asia Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, ASEAN, India, Rest of Asia Pacific)
– Latin America (Brazil, Rest of L.A.)
– Middle East and Africa (Turkey, GCC, Rest of Middle East)

The Circulation Evaporators market report provides the section which highlights country-wise demand for the Circulation Evaporators and provides a market outlook. The report also analyses the new technological developments as well as offerings for niche applications in the global Circulation Evaporators market. In last section of the report, a competitive landscape has been included to provide audiences with a dashboard view.

In addition, report explores the detailed market share analysis of the Circulation Evaporators market by considering the key manufacturers. Detailed profiling of the manufacturers is also included along with their business and growth strategies, key offerings and recent developments in the global Circulation Evaporators market.

Do You Have Any Query or Specific Requirement? Ask to Our Industry Expert@ https://www.innovateinsights.com/report/global-circulation-evaporators-market-2020-industry-analysis-size/256587/#buyinginquiry

Global Circulation Evaporators Market Report: Research Methodology

Market analysis is obtained through in-depth secondary research which is validated and verified by primary interviews. Every primary research is analyzed and average market volume is deduced and reconfirmed prior to incorporating in the report. The price of Circulation Evaporators is calculated across all the assessed regions and weighted average price is also considered. The market value of the global Circulation Evaporators market is thus calculated from the data deduced from the average selling price and market volume.

For future market growth, forecast of the global Circulation Evaporators market, offers the various macroeconomic factors and changing trends have been observed, based on which the future of the market is predicted. Other important factors covered by report includes the size of the current market, inputs from the supply side and the demand side and other dynamics shaping the scenario of the market. Report forecasts are offered in terms of CAGR, while other important criteria such as year-on-year growth and absolute dollar opportunity have also been incorporated giving clear insights and future opportunities.

Impact of Covid-19 in Circulation Evaporators Market

The utility-owned segment is mainly being driven by increasing financial incentives and regulatory supports from the governments globally. The current utility-owned Circulation Evaporators are affected primarily by the COVID-19 pandemic. Most of the projects in China, the US, Germany, and South Korea are delayed, and the companies are facing short-term operational issues due to supply chain constraints and lack of site access due to the COVID-19 outbreak. Asia-Pacific is anticipated to get highly affected by the spread of the COVID-19 due to the effect of the pandemic in China, Japan, and India. China is the epic center of this lethal disease. China is a major country in terms of the chemical industry.

Access Full Report, here: https://www.innovateinsights.com/report/global-circulation-evaporators-market-2020-industry-analysis-size/256587/

Source link

Continue Reading

Companies

OECD publishes model rules for tax reporting by gig economy platform operators–MNE Tax

Published

on

By

By Francesca Amaddeo, Researcher, Tax Law Competence Centre (SUPSI), Manno, Switzerland

On 3 July, the OECD released model rules for tax reporting by platform operators that assist sellers in the sharing and gig economy.

Following international efforts to address the tax challenges in the digital economy, this OECD guidance represents an important step towards transparency through the exchange of information.

Digitalization has shifted traditional employment contracts to independent work and has brought together sellers and customers. Consider, for instance, how to peer-to-peer online marketplaces and food delivery companies have blossomed during the pandemic.

Many business sectors now exploit digital platforms to provide services, especially accommodation, transport, and personal services.

Activities, previously part of the so-called shadow economy, are carried on through such intermediaries, whose transactions and payments are recorded in electronic form.

Thus, tax administrations have a great opportunity to correctly assess taxpayers (both individuals and entities) involved in the gig economy.

Reporting platforms operators and due diligence rules

As is the case for the common reporting standard and the mandatory disclosure rules, intermediaries are the keystone of this new mechanism.

The model outlines reporting obligation for platform operators, i.e., entities which contract with sellers interested in providing their services to users through a specific software product.

Under the model, reporting platform operators are subject to rules introduced where they are resident, incorporated, or managed, regardless of where sellers and users are located.

Such entities must comply with specific due diligence rules. First, they must identify sellers subject to reporting requirements. All relevant data, including name, address, TIN, date of birth, or business registration number, must be carefully collected and verified.

This information shall be automatically sent to competent authorities and involved jurisdictions identified from data collected.

Automatic exchange of information usually ensures high-quality, relevant information to tax authorities.

Moreover, the timely transmission of information allows tax administrations to be aware of revenue earned by platform sellers, sometimes omitted on their tax returns.

Adoption of the model rules would enhance compliance and reduce burdens for taxpayers.

An information statement, including income earned through platforms, as fees, commissions, and taxes paid or withheld by the operator, would be provided to taxpayers.

Challenging goals

With this release, the OECD again provides model rules aiming to achieve important goals. 

Some states have already introduced unilateral domestic measures, leading to international gaps. The goal pursued by the OECD is to standardize reporting rules eventually adopted by jurisdictions on platform sellers.

Uniformity helps taxpayers comply with their requirements, especially when they carry on cross-border activities.

Uniformity also promotes international cooperation between different jurisdictions. International tax assistance is proving to be one of the most powerful instruments to tackle tax evasion and tax avoidance.

The digital economy is still on the top of the OECD list. Even the European Union is discussing the introduction of a new directive amending the 2011/16/EU on tax administrative cooperation extending the exchange of information to data from digital platform providers.

As often happens in discussing data disclosure, a question remains unsolved: what about taxpayers’ rights? Are these measures proportionate to their scope?

 Let’s just wait and see.

Francesca Amaddeo

Dr. Francesca Amaddeo, PhD in European law and national legal systems, is an Italian lawyer that works as Researcher at the Tax Law Competence Centre, Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Science and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI).

Francesca Amaddeo

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2019 Gigger.news.