Connect with us


Gender and the Gig Economy: A qualitative study of Gig platforms for women workers



Despite the unprecedented growth of India’s gig economy and possible benefits to women service providers, little attention has been paid to the hurdles faced by women in pursuing gig work. Indeed, gig work has witnessed similar gendered division as has been evident in traditional work, and has not led to a direct increase in Female Labour Force Participation (FLPR) in India. This brief examines the existing literature on the problems faced by women gig workers and analyses the terms of use and privacy policy for a few platforms in India that cater to women gig workers. By scrutinising the platforms from a gender lens, this brief outlines the gaps that bar women’s inclusion in gig work and provides helpful recommendations.

Attribution: Ria Kasliwal, “Gender and the Gig Economy: A Qualitative Study of Gig Platforms for Women Workers,” ORF Issue Brief No. 359, May 2020, Observer Research Foundation.


India’s gig economy has witnessed an enormous surge in recent years, from the time Flipkart was the only digital platform in the country in 2010.[1] Since then, various digital platforms have flooded the market, catering to services such as housework, cosmetics, and food delivery. The platform economy has particularly attracted female service providers due to the flexibility it offers. However, there remain structural barriers to women’s entry into the gig economy. This brief analyses five Indian platforms that cater to “low-skilled”[2] women gig workers. It highlights some of the systemic gender issues that plague the gig economy in India and provides recommendations to address them.

India is the second-largest market of freelance professionals in the world (~15 million), second only to the United States (~53 million).[3] In the 2019 Noble House Report,[4] 81 percent of the major corporations surveyed reported using gig workers[a] for at least one major organisational issue in the past year. The same year, the Indian Ministry of Labour and Employment proposed the Code on Social Security Bill,[5] which recognised gig and platform workers for the first time and made provisions to offer them social security benefits. This was a welcome move, but its implementation has been hindered by the lack of adequate data on gig workers. While countries around the world have already started investing in collecting data, the measurement tends to be more complicated, since gig work remains only a supplementary source of income for many.

Inability to Facilitate Women’s Inclusion in Workforce

One of the main reasons for women’s high attrition rate in the workforce is the burden of simultaneously carrying out unpaid work at home and paid work in their professions, especially after starting families.[6] The flexibility offered by gig platforms allows workers to better manage unpaid care and paid work, by letting workers determine their work hours and reducing their dependence on a static physical space. As the gig economy gained more ground, it was assumed that more women would come into the ambit of the workforce in India, leading to an overall improvement in the workforce participation rate. Statistically, however, little improvement has been seen.[7]

Not only is the work mandated by socio-cultural norms, but the flexibility offered by gig work depends largely on whether it is a primary or supplementary source of income. Gig work as a primary source of income allows for less flexibility, compared to when such work is a source of additional earning. That “platformisation” has not managed to directly increase Female Labour Force Participation Rate (FLPR) in India is indicative of this inequity. For over two decades, the FLPR has seen a steady decline, dropping from over 30 percent in the early 2000s to 26 percent in 2018.[8] In 2017–18, the FLPR was 34 percent for the urban self-employed population and 13 percent for urban casual workers, compared to 42 percent and 14 percent in 2011–12, respectively, implying a fall in participation rate for both categories where gig workers could be included. Studies conducted in the UK show that women are more likely to exit from the gig economy.[9] This could be attributed to their income being of the ‘distressed’ category. Consequently, as soon as conditions improve, women leave the workforce (this phenomenon is widely visible in India’s informal economy as well).[10]

Unequal access to digital technologies is another significant hurdle to women’s participation in gig work. According to the GSMA Mobile Gender Gap Report 2019, only 16 percent of women in India are mobile internet users.[11] Despite government initiatives such as “Digital India,” digital literacy remains a problem amongst women. Women are also less likely to own mobile phones and devices[12] largely due to socio-cultural restrictions.[13] To address this issue, some platforms offer their own devices. However, this is a stop-gap solution; the imperatives are digital education, skills training and the removal of barriers of accessibility.

Structural Barriers, Gendered Work and Gender Pay Gap

In theory, the gig economy’s equal-opportunity nature is one of its strongest assets.[14] However, machine-learning algorithms are curated by coders who might program some inherent bias into them, and these algorithms also modify their actions by imitating the users. Therefore, algorithms are fully capable of reinforcing biases.[15] Thus, the platform economy can inadvertently promote gendered work.[16] Further, while platformisation allows combining paid work and unpaid care work, it tends to put women under extra work burden,[17] since they still take care of the majority of household work.

In a 2018 study conducted by Observer Research Foundation and World Economic Forum, 35 percent of the women surveyed were disinterested in joining the gig economy due to the lack of job security and uncertain employment status.[18] According to a study by Hunt and Machingura (2016), the rise of on-demand domestic work in India highlights unequal power relations emerging out of discrimination and exploitation against workers who are already more vulnerable in traditional domestic work.[19] The absence of women in central decision-making positions exacerbates these issues. A study on Uber workers in the US exposed a gender pay gap between men and women who performed similar tasks.[20] A similar study was conducted by Team Lease in India, which observed an 8–10 percent difference in monthly salary between male and female delivery executives.[21]

The problem in India is twofold: an inability to facilitate women’s movement into the workforce, and the perpetuation of structural and operational barriers promoting gendered division of gig work. Despite the introduction of the Code on Social Security Bill of 2019, the Indian platform economy continues to neglect the protection of women’s labour.



The study analyses the terms of use (ToU) and privacy policy (PP) for service providers of five platforms that cater to on-demand, low-skilled household services:[b] UrbanClap,[22] QuikrEasy,[23] Helpers4U,[24] Helpr,[25] BookMyBai.[26] The first two platforms offer services for low-skilled workers, e.g. carpenters, beauticians and plumbers. The next two offer domestic and office help services, but mainly cater to paid care work. The last one offers only domestic help services. Interviews with gig workers and platform operators were also conducted to obtain robust and realistic findings.

The objective was to conduct an analysis on the following themes:

  1. Do any specific conditionalities cater to women’s inclusion into the gig work?
  2. Are there provisions for privacy, safety and security for women gig workers?
  3. Are there are any social security and employment benefits provided to gig workers?
  4. Is there a definitive sexual division of work allotted?

While the first three themes were analysed by studying the ToU and PP (available publicly on the platform websites) and conducting interviews, the last one relied on the gender ratio data. A request was submitted for the provision of data on the gender ratio of work. However, the platforms did not respond, disallowing the author to gauge the gender ratio of the work allotted to the services professionals.

The above-mentioned platforms were chosen in the study as their rapid growth in India’s flourishing gig market helped in understanding the immediate concerns of the workers engaged and the sort of security provisions they provided to women workers, in particular.

Observations and Recommendations

The study highlighted several issues. These are discussed in the following paragraphs, along with relevant recommendations that are aimed at promoting increased participation of women in India’s gig economy.

1. Restrictions on Women’s Movement

Dispute Redressal System

The platforms have no specific policies to make it easier for women to enter the workforce. Further, there is an evident lack of any provision for dispute redressal. In case of a dispute between registered parties, the platforms claim no obligation to become involved and are not liable for any damages or demands. The only provisions offered are either cost-effective, unbiased and quick ways of solving disputes and/or redressal via arbitration or mediation instead of litigation. For feedback resolution, the platforms claim final authority on the action taken, without being obliged to any liability. Corrective actions can range from account termination to content modification or deletion. The lack of a free dispute-resolution system can lead to ambiguity in the process and extra expenses incurred thereby. Moreover, the end decision can still be influenced by the more powerful amongst the parties. Therefore, the threat of retaliation through negative or incorrect feedback might prevent workers from raising legitimate disputes.

The establishment of a transparent in-house dispute resolution system would be quite useful. The disputing parties could then present their cases without the fear of an absolute final call, which they otherwise would not be able to contest. The establishment of a dispute redressal body would be especially profitable for women service providers. Gig workers, in general, shy away from raising disputes not only because of the lengthy processes involved but because of the fear of a consequential fall in ratings. For a lot of women workers, gig work is the primary source of income,[27] which they cannot afford to lose. Consequently, they do not even raise disputes. The need for dispute redressal especially needs to be seen in the context of restrictions on women’s movement. Facilitating women’s inclusion in gig work necessitates the provision of an online in-house transparent dispute redressal system by the platform, where both parties could complain if there is any problem that emerges during the service.

2. Provision of Privacy, Safety and Security

Platform of Platforms 

In India, there are no legislations or institutions to comprehensively regulate digital platforms. While the Companies Act, 2013[28] governs the registered companies, it is inadequate for monitoring the actions of such dynamic platforms. Thus, a new and updated set of regulations is required, especially in light of the expansion of the gig economy network. The need of the hour is to establish a body or a “Platform of Platforms” with legislative backing, which would not only establish a standard set of guidelines that the platforms must adhere to but also monitor these platforms. The guidelines could include employee/worker code of conduct, rules for the dispute redressal body and mechanism, and instructions for other areas of governance.

For instance, only one platform amongst the five studied (Urban Clap) has a clause that mandates recording conversations prior to an agreement on the service. Such data can serve as valuable evidence in case of any dispute and ensure the digital safety of the service providers. This is especially important for women service providers, who are at a greater risk of harassment by potential service users, in the form of verbal abuse, stalking or bullying. A provision mandating recording service-related conversations can give women gig workers a sense of security. To ensure that the recording is not used as a mode of surveillance against the workers, the ability to record must be the prerogative of the workers, not of the platforms.[29] Self-defence training can also be made compulsory for all gig workers to empower women workers to ensure their safety if they find themselves in unsafe spaces while out for work.

The “Platform of Platforms” will be responsible for monitoring all digital platforms. In the event of any inconsistency, the platform can be held accountable and must face repercussions. This will ensure a safer digital as well as physical workspace for women gig workers.

Emergency Button 

The platforms have measures to ensure that both the service provider and service user are genuine, and urge all parties to practise further caution at an individual level. However, in an emergency situation,[30] e.g. one that may arise at the service user’s home, none of the platforms studied has a mechanism to ensure that service professionals can end the service and exit safely.

There is an urgent need to include an emergency button in the applications used by these service professionals, using which will terminate the service and send an SOS message to both the emergency contact of the service professional and the platform. In response, emergency transportation would immediately be dispatched to shift the service provider to a safe space. Such a mechanism is especially important for women workers, who might find themselves in an unsafe space post the start of the service.

Of the five platforms analysed in this study, only UrbanClap provides a safety procedure for workers who visit the client’s house for their service. The other platforms justify the absence of a safety procedure by arguing that their pre-service cautions are adequate.[31] However, if the service professional feels unsafe during the course of service delivery, there is no recourse to end the service immediately without facing negative consequences. In the backdrop of increasingly violent crimes against women in India, an emergency mechanism becomes extremely important to ensure a safer working environment.

Prevention of Workplace Harassment for Gig Workers

All five platforms specified the need for both the service users and the service providers to exercise caution and take reasonable precautions before engaging in any agreement. Further, background checks[32] are conducted more rigorously for the service providers, than the service users. However, the platforms withdraw the legal liability of any individual involved. For example, in the event of a service provider being harassed by a service user while providing the service, the issue will be termed a “dispute” and must be resolved independently by the two parties. Thus, there is no provision of registering a case of harassment.

The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 includes “any place visited by the ‘employee’ during the course of employment including the transportation.”[33] Under this Act, women employees can claim formal accountability against the harasser and a resolution thereby. However, since gig platforms categorise gig workers as “independent contractors,” the Act does not protect them. To protect their workers, digital platforms must not only create a safer network of service providers and users, but also include “workplace harassment” in their dispute categories.

Another way to ensure the safety of service providers is to include them in the 2013 Act by introducing a new section pertaining to gig-economy workers.[34] Women workers who face harassment could report to the specific platform through which they got that gig. The platform would then follow the clauses developed in the new section to reach a decision. Ultimately, any provision that permits women gig workers to depend on their platforms in the case of harassment will ensure a greater sense of security for women.

3. Social Security and Employment Benefits

Social Security and Lack of Data

The Government of India introduced the Social Security Code Bill in 2019. The draft code frames the role aggregators would play in the social security scheme. According to the proposal, an aggregator is “a digital intermediary or a marketplace for a buyer or user of a service to connect with the seller or the service provider.”[35]

The Bill intends to set up a national social security board for unorganised workers and makes provisions for the formulation of social welfare schemes for them, such as provident fund, employment injury benefit, housing, educational for children, skill upgrade of workers, funeral assistance, and old-age homes. The board will also disseminate information about these provisions to the unorganised sector, and states will set up workers’ facilitation for the same. This is a commendable attempt at creating better working conditions and providing necessary social benefits to gig workers. However, the absence of a proper database for gig workers poses a significant challenge, since it makes the entire process of providing services rather difficult. While the government plans to collect data from various major aggregators,[36] the scope of this will likely be very limited.

According to the Oxford Internet Institute’s “Online Labour Index,” India leads the global gig economy with a 24 percent share of the online labour market,[37] implying an increasing number of people working as gig workers. Additionally, several estimates point to a great potential for growth for gig work in India. For instance, a PayPal report states that the Indian gig economy is expected to reach US$20-30 billion by 2025.[38]

Thus, gig work must be included in a new category in the NSSO surveys to accurately ascertain the percentage of gig workers in the Indian economy. Data pertaining to the gig economy is essential to recognise the actual extent of gig work in India as well to understand where the labour force is employed. Moreover, such a database will help the government to better target their social security nets and develop evidence-based policies on the gig economy. It will also help highlight gaps in policy, allowing the government to curate better gender-based policy decisions on both macro and micro levels. Corporates too could use the data to understand the general service patterns, to analyse where the differences lie, and to identify the areas in which they could reskill or upskill their gig workers. Schemes pertaining to gig workers (e.g. the Code on Social Security) can be improved based on the data collected, and new safety and security measures can be added for women gig workers.

Employment Contracts 

Gig workers are referred to as “independent contractors,” rendering them unable to obtain any social security benefits that accrue to a regular employee of the company. However, this categorisation is unfair to workers who either devote their entire work time to one specific aggregator or are so essential to the everyday work of the platforms that without them, the platforms would cease to exist. In such cases, the state must provide social security benefits to the worker. More importantly, the gig workers must be categorised in a better position so that they can benefit from the same advantages as an employee of the company, especially when their work and time is analogous to that of an employee.

Legislation in the UK provides a unique solution to this.[39] The UK divides individuals into broadly three categories: self-employed, employees and a middle-category called “worker.” Gig workers can fall into any of these three categories. While the “self-employed” are entitled to almost no benefits and the “employees” have complete employment benefits including parental leave, the “worker” category is entitled to a minimum wage, paid vacation and pension. This division helps classify gig workers according to their working hours, mutuality of obligation, provision of services, devotion to one or more platforms, as well as the control exercised by the company over the worker. However, there is a caveat, wherein companies can choose to place their full-time employees into the “worker” category to withhold the full set of benefits. To prevent this from happening, the UK government provides all workers the right to contest their place in the organisation by taking up their case to HMRC (Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs) or the Government Pension Regulator.

Indian digital platforms can create a similar set of three categories to provide better benefits to those workers who are unfairly placed in the self-employed category, despite devoting most or all of their time to one aggregator. It would also lead to a better understanding of the percentage of actual gig workers, which will improve the database. To ensure the success of this model, gig workers must be educated on how to ascertain their placement in a company based on various factors. This will allow workers, especially those in the low-skilled category, to contest their placements if necessary and benefit from the schemes accordingly. Ultimately, this will also ensure the proper provision of social security benefits as per the 2019 Bill to the maximum number of people.

TABLE 1: Platforms Placed Against Suggested Recommendations

 Platforms/ Recommendations Urban Clap  Quikr
 Impact on Women Gig Workers
Dispute Redressal X X X X X Facilitates raising disputes to ensure ease of work.
Platform of Platforms* Guidelines could provide and ensure digital safety.
Inclusion in Workplace Harassment Laws* Space to report harassment, ensuring better and safe workplace.
Emergency Button X X X X Ensures physical safety and protection against any harm.
Data Collection* Leads to better facilitation of social security benefits.
Employment Contracts* Helps provide appropriate benefits associated with work and a space to contest.

*Recommendation needs legislative changes and isn’t present on any platform.


While the ambit of this brief is limited to low-skilled women gig workers, there is substantial scope for conducting similar, and more exhaustive, studies pertaining to high-skilled women gig workers. Such studies can focus on websites such as Freelancer and Upwork. It will be useful to look at the kind of barriers that these platforms present to women’s movement into gig work or how they put women at a disadvantage as compared to their male counterparts. Other areas of study could include the gender pay gap issue in the Indian platform economy, for both high- and low-skilled workers; the importance of privacy protection with regards to women gig workers; and gender bias in the algorithm-building process.

The gig economy seems to be the perfect way to facilitate the movement of more women into the workforce by making work flexible for them. After all, freelancing jobs and on-demand jobs do not rely on a physical workspace and provide the option of flexible work timings. This offers a much-desired alternative to the traditional setups that overburden working women, who often undertake most of the unpaid care work at home in addition to their full-time professions.[40] With less representation in management, male-centric norms and rules tend to be imposed, rarely incorporating women’s necessities.[41]

However, despite these advantages, data shows that the FLPR has gone down over the last two decades. Studies also show that gig work only reinforces the same gendered division of work that afflicts traditional work. Across countries, women working in the gig economy not only undertake unpaid care work but also spend just as much time on their gig jobs.[42] The study conducted for this brief highlights that while the aggregators have “no-discrimination” clauses in their ToU, they categorically facilitate discrimination by providing ways to filter service professionals based on gender.

Removing these barriers and biases is crucial to facilitating the movement of women workers into the gig economy. The entry of women into the workforce enables their financial independence and solves problems owing to low representation. This brief suggests some changes that will ensure the digital and physical safety of women gig workers, as well as general recommendations concerning employment classification. While the government is currently considering implementing provisions pertaining to social security benefits, much more needs to be done to remove these barriers.

The gig economy is here to stay and offers many ways for women to start and improve their careers. However, hurdles remain that discourage women from participating in gig work in greater numbers. Legislation must pave the way for more women in the workforce, both gig and otherwise. Further, aggregators and platforms must work harder to improve the conditions of work for women.[43] The future will only see more gig work, and the inclusion of women is critical for balanced growth.


[a] Gig workers are independent contractors, on demand workers, online platform workers and temporary workers, who fall outside the normal ‘employer-employee relationship’.

[b] The jobs undertaken by women gig workers in these platforms require some basic level of skill. For instance, the work done by cooks, beauty technicians or care workers can be considered “high-skilled work.” However, despite the skill level required, these jobs are categorised as low-skilled work and, in turn, have lower pay scales. Thus, the classification does not accurately represent the actual skill level required.

[1] Flipkart was founded in India in 2007.

[2] These include jobs such as domestic help, beauticians, cooks and nannies. The jobs may or may not require some basic skill levels.

[3]Future of Work In A Digital Era”, ICRIER, 2017.

[4]Flexibility and Gig Work”, Think Noble House, 2019.

[5]The Code on Social Security, 2019”, Government of India, 2019.

[6] Maternity attrition rate is 35 percent of the total female attrition rate. See Rica Bhattacharyya, “Companies’ Gender Diversity Drive Yet to Bear Fruit”, The Economic Times, 10 December 2018.

[7] Ibid.

[8]Labor Force Participation Rate, Female (% Of Female Population Ages 15+) (Modeled ILO Estimate) | Data”, World Bank, 2020.

[9] Emma Samman and Abigail Hunt, “Gender and The Gig Economy”, ODI Working Paper 546, January 2019.

[10] Venkatesh Athreya, “Women and Work”, The Hindu Frontline, 19 June 2009.

[11]Connected Women: The Mobile Gender Gap Report 2019”, GSM Association, 2019.

[12] Ibid.

[13] PTI, “UP Khap Panchayat Bans Jeans, Mobile Phones for Girls”, The Hindu, 28 May 2016.

[14] The notion of “no-bias” comes from a prevalent idea that platform algorithms are objective.

[15] Claire Cain Miller, “When Algorithms Discriminate”, New York Times, 9 July 2015.

[16] Brhmie Balaram, Josie Warden and Fabian Wallace-Stephens, “Good Gigs: A Fairer Future For The UK’S Gig Economy”, RSA, April 2017; Diana Farrell and Fiona Greig, “The Online Platform Economy: Has Growth Peaked?” Report, JP Morgan Chase, 15 November 2017.

[17] Emma Samman and Abigail Hunt, op. cit.; Abigail Hunt and Fortunate Machingura, “A Good Gig? The Rise of On-Demand Domestic Work”, ODI Working Paper 07, December 2016, .

[18] Terri Chapman, Samir Saran, Rakesh Sinha, Suchi Kedia and Sriram Gutta, The Future of Work in India, ORF, October 2018.

[19] Abigail Hunt and Fortunate Machingura, op. cit.

[20] Cody Cook, Rebecca Diamond, Jonathan Hall, John A. List and Paul Oyer, “The Gender Earnings Gap in The Gig Economy: Evidence from Over A Million Rideshare Drivers”, Stanford University, 8 March 2019.

[21]Women Bag Frontline Roles in Gig Economy, But Lag Behind in Wages”, The Economic Times.

[22]Terms of Service”, Urban Clap; “Privacy Policy,” Urban Clap,

[23]Terms of Service”, Quikr Easy; “Privacy Policy”, Quikr Easy.

[24]Terms of Service“, Helpr4U; “Privacy Policy,” Helper4U,

[25]Terms of Service and Privacy Policy”, Helpr.

[26]Terms of Service”, Book My Bai. “Privacy Policy”, Book My Bai.

[27]58% Successful Gig Economy Professionals Are Women: Study”, United News of India, 8 September 2018.

[28]The Companies Act, 2013”, Government of India.

[29] Any set of guidelines must incorporate data privacy protection for gig workers. To read more the importance of data privacy, see Danica Sergison, “Privacy risks for customers and workers in the gig economy”, Privacy International, 2 September 2018; “Case Study: The Gig Economy and Exploitation”, Privacy International, 20 August 2017.

[30] Any situation that might harm one’s emotional and physical safety, including sexual assault.

[31] Mainly includes credit background checks and letting both service providers and users exercise their judgement about the other.

[32] The platforms have algorithms that ensure the parties are not bots and have an authentic national identity and credible credit. However, the background checks are more exhaustive for service providers than for service users.

[33]The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013”, Government of India.

[34] The Act could start with clauses that are relatively more feasible to implement.

[35]The Code on Social Security, 2019”, Government of India.

[36] Yogima Seth Sharma and Kirtika Suneja, “Professional Bodies and Gig Economy Players to File Data on Jobs; Govt to Notify Framework for Collating Data”, The Economic Times, 13 August 2019.

[37]Where Are Online Workers Located? The International Division of Digital Gig Work”, The ilabour, Project, University of Oxford, 11 July 2017.

[38]Insights into The Freelancer Ecosystem”, PayPal, 2020.

[39]Gig Economy Employment Status”, PWC, May 2019.

[40] Sona Mitra, “Women and Unpaid Work in India: A Macroeconomic Overview”, IWWAGE, 7 March 2019.

[41] With less representation in management, male-centric norms and rules tend to be imposed, rarely incorporating women’s necessities.

[42] Abigail Hunt, Emma Samman, Sherry Tapfuma, Grace Mwaura and Rhoda Omenya with Kay Kim, Sara Stevano and Aida Roumer, “Women in The Gig Economy”, ODI Report, November 2019.

[43] Undertaking measures to improve women’s inclusion in gig work will benefit the platforms not only by attracting more women workers but also ensuring greater governmental, public and social support.

Source link


The family of a delivery rider who died on the job is calling for a gig economy overhaul




It took more than three weeks before the family of Chow Khai Shien were finally able to lay him to rest in Malaysia. 

“My mom just cannot accept that he passed away in a foreign country, that he passed away alone,” his sister Kai Sing Chow told SBS News from Singapore. 

“We have not seen him for a year because of the pandemic, he had plans to return home to Malaysia next January.” 

Mr Chow, 36, died in late October after a crash in Melbourne’s CBD while he was delivering food on a motor scooter. 

He is one of five delivery riders who have died on the job in Australia in the past two months. The Transport Workers’ Union has described the spate of deaths as a “crisis of national importance”.  

Hampered by COVID-19 travel restrictions, Mr Chow’s family held a virtual funeral in Melbourne, organised by his lone relative in the country, a cousin.  His ashes were then sent to Malaysia. 

Mr Chow had dreams of owning a restaurant with his family and working as a chef.

He was already working as a chef at a Melbourne restaurant but lost his job when the pandemic hit and lockdown restrictions came into effect.   

“He needed to earn money, to get by. I remember asking him, are you sure you want to work as a delivery rider, I worried about his safety on the roads, but he told me it was safe.

“And now we have seen, that he has passed away just because of a few dollars of delivery. It makes my heart break.” 

Chow Khai Shien (left) with his family.

Chow Khai Shien (left) with his family.


In Australia, most gig economy workers are classified as independent contractors, not employees.  

Independent contractors are not entitled to benefits such as minimum wages, superannuation, and workers compensation.  While some delivery companies do offer a level of cover, there is no legal requirement for businesses to do so. 

Jim Stanford, economist and director of the Centre for Future Work, said the characterisation of delivery riders as independent contractors was a “technological loophole”. 

“By hiring and firing people through an application, these digital businesses try to pretend these workers are not workers, that they are independent contractors, that is a technological fiction.

“In practical terms, that’s ridiculous.  These workers are clearly working for these digital platforms, performing relatively menial and often dangerous tasks for low pay. 

“I don’t think this loophole should mean that these workers are deprived of the rights that any other worker in the economy would have.” 

Mr Chow (left) had dreams of owning a restaurant with his family and working as a chef.

Mr Chow (left) had dreams of owning a restaurant with his family and working as a chef.


Since September, five delivery workers have died on Australian roads. Four of the deaths were in Sydney. 

The NSW state government recently set up a task force to investigate the deaths.

It will be led by SafeWork New South Wales and Transport for New South Wales and will examine whether any avoidable risks may have contributed to the deaths and whether there are improvements that need to be made to enhance safety.

Calls for more rights and protections 

Chow Kai Sing – Mr Chow’s sister – said she is speaking out because she hopes her brother’s death can spur changes that prevent similar fatalities in the future. 

She hopes that government regulation will mandate for all delivery companies to have personal accident insurance and to have more safety protocols for the protection of riders. 

“Many of these riders are the most vulnerable, they are on the lowest income and they are putting themselves out, exposing themselves during the COVID pandemic. 

“I know that many of them rush from order to order to make deadlines that are set out by the delivery companies, and they are dying in this line of work.” 

The Transport Workers Union has been advocating for the federal government to set up a tribunal to deal with the gig economy. 

“It needs to set up a tribunal that can then put in place appropriate protections for these workers and put in place obligations on these companies so they can’t run around like it is the Wild West.” 

Federal Industrial Relations Minister Christian Porter said the issue was largely a state and territory one, but committed to bringing it up at the next meeting of work health and safety ministries.

“Every worker, no matter how their employment arrangements are structured, has the right to a safe working environment and to come home to their families at the end of each day,” he said in a statement.

DoorDash, the company which Chow Khai Shien was working for, told SBS News in a statement that health and safety is its priority and that it has signed an agreement with the Transport Workers’ Union earlier this year to provide a broad range of protections for its drivers. 

Source link

Continue Reading


Australia’s gig economy faces a reckoning as delivery death toll mounts




The federal government is facing increasing pressure to regulate Australia’s ‘gig economy’ following a spate of delivery rider deaths.

Five delivery riders working for apps including UberEats, DoorDash and Hungry Panda have been killed on the job in the past two months.

On Monday, an as yet unnamed rider died while working for UberEats in Sydney, just two days after the death of another UberEats rider, Bijoy Paul, on Saturday.

The deaths follow those of DoorDash rider Chow Khai Shien in Melbourne on October 24 and UberEats riders Xiaojun Chen on September 29, and Dede Fredy on September 27.

Of the five men killed, two were riding bicycles, two were riding motorcycles, and one was riding a scooter.

The deaths have shone a light on the precarious and dangerous conditions facing gig economy workers who are classified as independent contractors and, therefore, lack many of the rights and protections enjoyed by employees.

Food delivery workers are also often on temporary visas and have been excluded from the Morrison government’s pandemic safety nets JobSeeker and JobKeeper.

This leaves them little option but to take on low-paid, insecure and risky gig economy jobs to survive.

A Transport Workers Union survey of delivery riders in September showed that average earnings after costs were just over $10 an hour.

Nearly 90 per cent of riders reported their pay had decreased, and 70 per cent said they were struggling to pay bills and buy food.

On Wednesday, food delivery riders and TWU representatives held a vigil for the five riders killed since September and laid flowers in front of UberEats’ Sydney headquarters.

The TWU called on the federal government to step in and “stop the carnage”.

“The death of five workers in less than two months is devastating,” TWU national secretary Michael Kaine said.

“It’s not good enough that states are in a piecemeal way trying to address the problem these billion-dollar global tech giants have created. We need the federal government to act and regulate.”

Companies such as Uber have “been allowed to get away with trampling on workers’ rights and risking their lives”, Mr Kaine said.

New South Wales has established a taskforce and parliamentary inquiry into the gig economy, but the findings not expected to be released until late 2021.

Last week, representatives of food delivery app Hungry Panda failed to front the inquiry without explanation.

Riding advocates Bicycle Network said the inquiry’s findings “must be expedited so a better workplace for food delivery riders can be made as soon as possible”.

“We cannot wait 12 months until reforms are made to bring gig-economy standards into line with what Australians expect and deserve,” a statement from the organisation said.

It’s an emerging crisis that requires urgent action before more lives are tragically lost.”

Bicycle Network called on federal and state governments to “create safer road environments that can stop crashes from happening or reduce their severity”.

Regulation, not consumer boycotts, the answer

University of Technology Sydney business and consumer ethics expert Martijn Boersma said federal government regulation and not consumer boycotts is what Australia’s gig economy workers need.

Consumer boycotts could help food delivery companies “see the light” by “making them hurt financially”, but the onus to fix the problem must be on the government, not consumers, Dr Boersma said.

“It’s up to the government to regulate the so-called gig economy properly.

“They have left it unregulated for such a long time that we now have basically a two-tiered employment system where we have people, in the name of the gig economy, effectively doing piecework.”

Dr Boersma pointed out that gig economy companies have a history of pouring eye-watering sums into lobbying against workers’ rights.

In California, Uber and Lyft recently spent more than a-quarter-of-a-billion dollars to successfully fight law reform that would have seen gig economy contractors classified as employees.

‘Problem exists’, but it’s up to states to fix it: Porter

Federal Attorney-General and Minister for Industrial Relations Christian Porter this week acknowledged that a “problem exists in relation to delivery riders”, but argued it is up to states and territories to fix it.

“Every worker, no matter how their employment arrangements are structured, has the right to a safe working environment and to come home to their families at the end of each day,” Mr Porter said in a statement issued on Tuesday.

“For delivery riders, maintaining that safe work environment is a state and territory government responsibility … changes need to be made by state and a territory governments to prevent further injuries or loss of life.”

The delivery rider in Australia earns about $10 an hour on average. Photo: Getty

Despite arguing the Commonwealth “has no direct authority to make changes in this area”, Mr Porter said the federal government” can play a leadership role on issues such as this”.

“That is why I intend to have rider safety added as a priority agenda item for the next meeting of national work health and safety (WHS) ministers,” he said.

“I will seek agreement from ministers for Safe Work Australia (SWA), as the national WHS and workers’ compensation policy agency, to urgently consider education and awareness strategies, including necessary prevention measures, to improve safety outcomes for all gig workers, including delivery riders.”

The New Daily put questions to UberEats, DoorDash, Menulog, Deliveroo, and Hungry Panda.

“Recent events have been devastating for the families and friends impacted and for the wider delivery community,” an UberEats spokesperson said.

“Safety is fundamental to us and we have instituted a number of measures over recent years to keep those who use the platform safe, including onboarding modules covering road and bike safety, an annual cycling safety test, and cycling specific navigation.

“We also have a partner support package should something go wrong while a delivery partner is using the app, which Uber funds at no additional cost to partners.”

Road safety is “a complex area, which requires industry co-operation with experts and government stakeholders,” the spokesperson said.

“UberEats is committed to an industry response and in recent weeks we have begun conversations with other delivery businesses and the restaurant community on safety standards for the industry,” they said.

“We will continue to advocate for minimum insurance standards across platforms to ensure all those earning through independent work have access to insurance regardless of which app they are using.”

A spokesperson for Deliveroo said the company “is saddened by the recent tragic deaths of the food delivery workers and our thoughts are with the families and rider communities during this sad time.

“Deliveroo provides every rider with free personal injury and income protection insurance, which activates as soon as a rider logs on to the app, and up to an hour after their last delivery,” the spokesperson said.

“Compensation for dependents or family in the event of a death or permanent disability is included in the insurance policy. We also provide free public liability insurance.

“There is no doubt that the issues of road safety are complex and require the input of experts, industry and government to build solutions. We are committed to working with stakeholders to achieve this.”

DoorDash, Menulog, and Hungry Panda did not respond by deadline.

Source link

Continue Reading


TCS tries out gig-type working models in pandemic’s wake




Tata Consultancy Services, India’s largest IT-services company, is piloting alternate work models, including a gig model, to deliver its projects, as it explores the changes brought about by the Covid-19 pandemic.IT companies, which had typically required people to work from the office, have had to change to an almost-complete work-from-home model. TCS is testing out various models, the company’s human resources head told ET.“We are looking at

Source link

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2019