Connect with us


Vinnie Jones calls Juggernaut role in ‘X-Men: Last Stand’ the most ‘disappointing’ gig of his career



Vinnie Jones is speaking out about the “disappointing” role he had working on the third installment in the “X-Men” franchise, “Last Stand.”

The actor and former soccer player was brought on to portray the character Juggernaut, a wildly popular villain in Marvel comics who is often depicted as having particular ties to the super-powered team’s leader, Professor Xavier. However, his portrayal of the character, like the rest of the movie, has been criticized by comic book fans over the years and now Jones is hoping to set the record straight.

Speaking to ComicBookMovie, Jones explained that he was brought onto the project by director Matthew Vaughn. However, Vaughn had to leave the project for personal reasons and Brett Ratner was tapped as his replacement. As Jones puts it, Ratner almost immediately started slashing Juggernaut’s role in the film.


“I basically got mugged off. Matthew Vaughn signed me up, and it was a great role and a great script, and Juggernaut was a great character. I signed up for three of them, and that will show you how serious I was about it,” Jones told the outlet. “Brett Ratner basically dissolved the character. I was in my f—ing trailer half the time. It’s one of the most disappointing jobs I’ve been on as far as, you know, ‘What am I doing here?'”

Vinnie Jones opened up about his role in 'X-Men: Last Stand'

Vinnie Jones opened up about his role in ‘X-Men: Last Stand’
(David Livingston/Getty Images)

Jones explained that there was a significantly richer story for Juggernaut in the movie, and said Ratner made empty promises to restore most of it.

“It wasn’t the same Juggernaut as I signed on for. They took his storyline away, they’d taken his character away, his dialogue. I had two big meetings with Brett about it, and he said, ‘Yeah, yeah, it’s coming. They’re writing stuff for you as we speak’ and it never f—ing happened,” he explained. “Disappointment wise, that was probably one of the biggest.


Jones notes that the worst part of the ordeal was that he had every intention of doing right by comic book fans, but now gets ridiculed and blamed for the watered-down version that made it to the screen in 2006.

“It was f—ing nothing to do with me! That role, I didn’t sign up for. The Juggernaut you saw was not the Juggernaut I signed on for with Matthew Vaughn, I’ll tell you that now. It upset me,” he said.

Jones added: “I know what it means to the fans, and I felt like I was a bit of a scapegoat as no one ever told my side of it. Nobody ever stood up and said, ‘Hold on a minute, we completely whitewashed Vinnie’s character.’ Basically, I was an extra, mate. That’s how I felt. I was gutted, to be honest.”


Jones said that he’d “love a chance at putting it right” in a future “X-Men” movie. However, it’s likely that ship has sailed now that “Deadpool 2” resurrected the character as a VFX giant voiced by Ryan Reynolds.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Australia’s gig economy faces a reckoning as delivery death toll mounts




The federal government is facing increasing pressure to regulate Australia’s ‘gig economy’ following a spate of delivery rider deaths.

Five delivery riders working for apps including UberEats, DoorDash and Hungry Panda have been killed on the job in the past two months.

On Monday, an as yet unnamed rider died while working for UberEats in Sydney, just two days after the death of another UberEats rider, Bijoy Paul, on Saturday.

The deaths follow those of DoorDash rider Chow Khai Shien in Melbourne on October 24 and UberEats riders Xiaojun Chen on September 29, and Dede Fredy on September 27.

Of the five men killed, two were riding bicycles, two were riding motorcycles, and one was riding a scooter.

The deaths have shone a light on the precarious and dangerous conditions facing gig economy workers who are classified as independent contractors and, therefore, lack many of the rights and protections enjoyed by employees.

Food delivery workers are also often on temporary visas and have been excluded from the Morrison government’s pandemic safety nets JobSeeker and JobKeeper.

This leaves them little option but to take on low-paid, insecure and risky gig economy jobs to survive.

A Transport Workers Union survey of delivery riders in September showed that average earnings after costs were just over $10 an hour.

Nearly 90 per cent of riders reported their pay had decreased, and 70 per cent said they were struggling to pay bills and buy food.

On Wednesday, food delivery riders and TWU representatives held a vigil for the five riders killed since September and laid flowers in front of UberEats’ Sydney headquarters.

The TWU called on the federal government to step in and “stop the carnage”.

“The death of five workers in less than two months is devastating,” TWU national secretary Michael Kaine said.

“It’s not good enough that states are in a piecemeal way trying to address the problem these billion-dollar global tech giants have created. We need the federal government to act and regulate.”

Companies such as Uber have “been allowed to get away with trampling on workers’ rights and risking their lives”, Mr Kaine said.

New South Wales has established a taskforce and parliamentary inquiry into the gig economy, but the findings not expected to be released until late 2021.

Last week, representatives of food delivery app Hungry Panda failed to front the inquiry without explanation.

Riding advocates Bicycle Network said the inquiry’s findings “must be expedited so a better workplace for food delivery riders can be made as soon as possible”.

“We cannot wait 12 months until reforms are made to bring gig-economy standards into line with what Australians expect and deserve,” a statement from the organisation said.

It’s an emerging crisis that requires urgent action before more lives are tragically lost.”

Bicycle Network called on federal and state governments to “create safer road environments that can stop crashes from happening or reduce their severity”.

Regulation, not consumer boycotts, the answer

University of Technology Sydney business and consumer ethics expert Martijn Boersma said federal government regulation and not consumer boycotts is what Australia’s gig economy workers need.

Consumer boycotts could help food delivery companies “see the light” by “making them hurt financially”, but the onus to fix the problem must be on the government, not consumers, Dr Boersma said.

“It’s up to the government to regulate the so-called gig economy properly.

“They have left it unregulated for such a long time that we now have basically a two-tiered employment system where we have people, in the name of the gig economy, effectively doing piecework.”

Dr Boersma pointed out that gig economy companies have a history of pouring eye-watering sums into lobbying against workers’ rights.

In California, Uber and Lyft recently spent more than a-quarter-of-a-billion dollars to successfully fight law reform that would have seen gig economy contractors classified as employees.

‘Problem exists’, but it’s up to states to fix it: Porter

Federal Attorney-General and Minister for Industrial Relations Christian Porter this week acknowledged that a “problem exists in relation to delivery riders”, but argued it is up to states and territories to fix it.

“Every worker, no matter how their employment arrangements are structured, has the right to a safe working environment and to come home to their families at the end of each day,” Mr Porter said in a statement issued on Tuesday.

“For delivery riders, maintaining that safe work environment is a state and territory government responsibility … changes need to be made by state and a territory governments to prevent further injuries or loss of life.”

The delivery rider in Australia earns about $10 an hour on average. Photo: Getty

Despite arguing the Commonwealth “has no direct authority to make changes in this area”, Mr Porter said the federal government” can play a leadership role on issues such as this”.

“That is why I intend to have rider safety added as a priority agenda item for the next meeting of national work health and safety (WHS) ministers,” he said.

“I will seek agreement from ministers for Safe Work Australia (SWA), as the national WHS and workers’ compensation policy agency, to urgently consider education and awareness strategies, including necessary prevention measures, to improve safety outcomes for all gig workers, including delivery riders.”

The New Daily put questions to UberEats, DoorDash, Menulog, Deliveroo, and Hungry Panda.

“Recent events have been devastating for the families and friends impacted and for the wider delivery community,” an UberEats spokesperson said.

“Safety is fundamental to us and we have instituted a number of measures over recent years to keep those who use the platform safe, including onboarding modules covering road and bike safety, an annual cycling safety test, and cycling specific navigation.

“We also have a partner support package should something go wrong while a delivery partner is using the app, which Uber funds at no additional cost to partners.”

Road safety is “a complex area, which requires industry co-operation with experts and government stakeholders,” the spokesperson said.

“UberEats is committed to an industry response and in recent weeks we have begun conversations with other delivery businesses and the restaurant community on safety standards for the industry,” they said.

“We will continue to advocate for minimum insurance standards across platforms to ensure all those earning through independent work have access to insurance regardless of which app they are using.”

A spokesperson for Deliveroo said the company “is saddened by the recent tragic deaths of the food delivery workers and our thoughts are with the families and rider communities during this sad time.

“Deliveroo provides every rider with free personal injury and income protection insurance, which activates as soon as a rider logs on to the app, and up to an hour after their last delivery,” the spokesperson said.

“Compensation for dependents or family in the event of a death or permanent disability is included in the insurance policy. We also provide free public liability insurance.

“There is no doubt that the issues of road safety are complex and require the input of experts, industry and government to build solutions. We are committed to working with stakeholders to achieve this.”

DoorDash, Menulog, and Hungry Panda did not respond by deadline.

Source link

Continue Reading


TCS tries out gig-type working models in pandemic’s wake




Tata Consultancy Services, India’s largest IT-services company, is piloting alternate work models, including a gig model, to deliver its projects, as it explores the changes brought about by the Covid-19 pandemic.IT companies, which had typically required people to work from the office, have had to change to an almost-complete work-from-home model. TCS is testing out various models, the company’s human resources head told ET.“We are looking at

Source link

Continue Reading


Some CA Gig Workers May Be Forced To Repay EDD Benefits Due To Overpayment – CBS Los Angeles




LOS ANGELES (CBSLA) — Gig workers who are receiving unemployment may be on the hook to pay back some of their benefits due to overpayment.

Dianne Christman said she believes she may have to pay EDD between $5,500 and $6,500.

“The stress level is off the charts,” she said. “They’re asking money from people who have no income. It’s an oxymoron to be honest.”

Christman is an out-of-work Lyft driver. When she applied for pandemic unemployment assistance in April, she said she was told to submit her 1099 as proof of income. As it turns out, independent contractors needed to report their net income — not gross income.

“Unfortunately, with Pandemic Unemployment Assistance, overpayment has to be recouped,” said Michele Evermore, a senior researcher with the National Employment Law Project. “There is no waiver for that.”

Evermore said that, at the beginning of the pandemic, the focus was on getting money out to the unemployed as quickly as possible.

“Because states focused, rightly on processing old claims, it took a while for states to identify overpayment, so once they get there it’s been months and so people have gotten overpayments for a very long time,” she said.

Greg Bevis, who is also a gig worker, said he calculated that he and his wife may be on the hook for up to $13,000.

“So 13,000 dollars for a household that made under $60k combined is a lot of money,” he said.

Bevis said he and his wife believed they were supposed to report gross income when they applied.

“If we had known we didn’t qualify for it, there is no way we would have spent or even taken that money in the first place,” he said.

Evermore said that Congress could waive non-fraudulent overpayments in the next stimulus bill, adding that about half of all people receiving unemployment benefits right now are doing so through pandemic assistance programs

“So every dollar you give someone in an unemployment insurance benefit generates $1.61 in local economic activity,” she said. “When you suck it out of the economy, you’re not just taking back the dollars that you gave to that worker, you’re taking back all that buying power.”

In a statement, an EDD spokesperson said that “overpayments are always a part of the Unemployment Insurance program across the country. We do not have any readily available data on total formal overpayments and do not track the circumstances of how the claim reached that status.”

Anyone who received benefits they were not eligible for should receive notice by mail, according to EDD. The notice should explain the reason for the overpayment, the amount and penalties, as well as information about appeal rights.

“The EDD generally classifies overpayments into two categories: fraud or non-fraud,” the spokesperson wrote, providing these descriptions for each:

  • Fraud: If the EDD finds that you intentionally gave false information or withheld information and, as a result, received benefits that you should not have received, the overpayment is considered fraud. Withholding or giving false information to obtain benefits is a serious offense that can result in penalties and criminal prosecution. With a fraud overpayment, you can receive a penalty equal to 30 percent of the overpayment amount. Additionally, you can be disqualified for 5 to 23 weeks. You must repay fraud overpayments and penalties.
  • Non-Fraud: If you received benefits you were not eligible for and the overpayment was not your fault, the overpayment is considered non-fraud. You will receive a notice telling you if the overpayment must be repaid.

Source link

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2019