Connect with us


A Public-Run Gig Economy Platform? Unlikely. But Healthcare Example Provides Policy Lessons



More than one-third of the U.S. workforce (36%) participated in the gig economy in 2018, a figure that some predict could rise to more than 50% by 2023. This trend accelerated significantly in 2020, largely driven by the fallout from Covid-19 and its impact on small businesses and larger employers’ budget and resulting mass layoffs. 

Regardless of whether this shift is being driven by individual preference or necessity, there are significant public policy interests at hand: many safety net benefits for individuals in the U.S. have been funded or administered by employers. Accordingly, there have been state legislative efforts to force the companies enabling gig work – technology platforms such as Lyft, DoorDash, UpWork and others – to categorize the workers as ‘employees’. 

2020 saw platform companies fight back, collectively spending $200 million to promote (and subsequently win) the Proposition 22 direct ballot measure in California, which exempts these companies from classifying independent contractors as employees. 

With platform tech giants spending this type of capital to protect their interests, questions have come up around how to protect workers concerns. 

One answer? A ‘public market’ marketplace option: creating a government-run gig economy platform, which could infuse competition into marketplaces that have historically been thought of as “winner take all” and could protect for gig workers’ interests and that of the public.

But, should the government be in the gig economy marketplace business? 

British entrepreneur, Wingham Rowan, founder of Modern Markets for All and a long-time TV and media figure, believes so. A vocal proponent for a public gig-work option, Rowan believes that having government-run marketplaces is the best way to improve in the best interest of gig workers and provide a public good —  and the only way to address what he outlines as the key issues impacting gig workers.The public marketplaces, which Rowan calls “Public Official E-Markets”, or POEMs, would be overseen by government entities or non-profits to ensure they are run as public utilities.

Roadblocks To Public Platforms Solving The Gig Economy’s Problems

There are a few problems with taking a POEM-approach to expanding the gig economy that Rowan and policymakers should consider prior to making any investments: 

1. Big vision vs nailing the narrow “core interaction”

Rowan outlines a big, bold vision for how a government-run gig economy platform could provide a public benefit, with the article noting that, “If public e-markets really took off, they would fill with a constant hum of microeconomic activity, drawing an ever-wider set of people into exchanges of goods and services without private companies cashing in.”

The challenge with this big vision is that by their very nature, platforms that seek to be successful must start out with a very limited scope. Why? Three key reasons: 

  1. The value of the platform itself tends to come from the size of the network of users of the platform (commonly referred to as Network Effects);
  2. In order to attract users they typically face a “chicken and egg” adoption problem in which each “side” of users (buyers or sellers, for instance) wait for the other to join; and
  3. In order to create enough value to keep each side on the platform, they need to quickly facilitate enough value to both sides that both decide to continue using the platform (and not other methods) for future interactions

This may all sound easy, but even if one solves the adoption problem, this can prove a false victory if the third piece is not addressed in time. Termed the “core interaction”, this seemingly simple concept largely explains the difference between eBay and Yahoo! Auction, Bumble’s success by putting women in control, and Lyft’s increasing ride-matching success. 

If the platform cannot create successful interactions for those first early users, those users drop off the platform, which reduces the value to remaining users. Indeed, Rowan himself seems to recognize the folly of ‘big vision’ thinking based on his experience with a government-run platform: “‘The first week, with very little publicity, they had eighteen thousand hours of residents’ availability for work…. [but] they had seventy hours of demand from employers, because nobody had thought to outreach to the demand side.’”

2. Government as matchmaker and holder of sensitive financial information

A primary role of most gig economy platforms is to help reduce “search costs” by providing a curation function: to make a match between supplier and consumer as easy, fast and successful as possible. This curation can come in different forms: Lyft uses GPS to efficiently match drivers and riders; Amazon allows users to rate the quality of products and merchants; Airbnb encourages hosts to post pictures so guests aren’t surprised, etc. 

A secondary role of platforms is to minimize “transaction costs,” which are all costs associated with consummating a commercial transaction, including those not commonly thought of. Upwork, for instance, provides standardized contracting, dispute resolution, payment, and other services to remove as much friction as possible for both sides (the payer and freelancer) of the transaction. 

Rowan makes the case that a government-run platform could fulfill the same set of functions: “As on Uber, buyers and sellers would accumulate reliability records; unlike on Uber, features such as health-care contributions and retirement benefits could be built in.”

To this end, there are two immediate (and likely many more) questions that come up that pose a challenge for any government-run platform:

  1. When push comes to shove, which “side’s” interest should drive the matching algorithm? 
  2. Do we really want the government (or a contractor) storing the type of sensitive personal information necessary to make transactions seamless? 

Regarding the first, there are typically small nuances that make or break a platform’s matching success. Bumble IPO’d this year because it put women (not men) in charge of matchmaking and the first point of outreach; similarly, Lyft outperforms Uber with a smaller network in part because it focused on and prioritized the importance of managing the quality of both its drivers and riders. At the end of the day, the challenge for a public marketplace will be in determining which side’s interests are preferred in order to determine the proper matching algorithm — and this isn’t easy, especially when trying to serve a public good.

Regarding the second — and what could ultimately be the public option’s fatal flaw — it maps back to consumer trust. Platforms like Uber and Lyft, DoorDash and GrubHub, etc. all store personal and financial data about its users to drive quick, seamless transactions. Will the American public want the government to have visibility and control of our private information? There will be inherent trust issues in that people may not trust a government-run platform for that very reason. 

3. Platforms require organizational agility, not exactly the government’s strong suit

From 2006 to 2016, research indicates that 94% of large federal information technology projects were unsuccessful, more than 50% were delayed, over budget, or didn’t meet expectations, and 41.4% were deemed complete failures. Because governments and nonprofits typically do not have the technical skills, experience or resources required, they are not in the position to launch, manage, grow, govern, or monetize a gig-focused platform company. 

Furthermore, developing a plan to attract and create value for just one set of users requires rapid testing and iterating on a multitude of factors; doing this for two different sets of users is even harder. 

There are also user interface and experience (UI/UX) considerations, which require both a very specific set of technical skills to build and constant improvements to keep up with changing market expectations. We don’t usually associate public utilities with having a slick UI, but this is an incredibly important part of creating platform “stickiness” in terms of keeping people active on the platform. 

Shortcomings in both of these areas should raise a red flag: research suggests that platform companies fail at twice the rate as non-platform tech startups. And in a recent study of 250 platforms, the authors found that many gig economy platforms collapsed within two to three years because they did not have enough users or funding.

While Rowan does mention having a private company involved in public platform development in his article, simply outsourcing this function and to a private company with the lowest bid for the job — or, worse, to a government entity or non-profit with little to no experience in platform development and marketplace creation — is likely to be the public platform demise

An Example And Exception: HealthCare.Gov

With the enactment of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in March 2010 came the introduction of health insurance exchange marketplaces, including Healthcare.Gov. Launched on October 1, 2013, lets consumers compare and shop for coverage, identify if they qualify for federal subsidies, and enroll in a chosen plan. 

Like other federal IT efforts, Healthcare.Gov’s rollout was anything but smooth. The initial failure was mocked by government officials and talk show personalities alike, with only six individuals successfully completing and signing up for individual insurance on launch day. It also came in at ~17X its initial $93.7M budget, ultimately costing $1.7B. 

Today, the experience on is much different than it was eight years ago. This is largely because of the government’s fixed technical issues with the site itself, but also because the platform itself serves different functions than those that Rowan envisions. 

First, itself has a process by which individuals can identify if they qualify for a subsidy. Second, the insurance exchanges aggregate vast amounts of information from multiple plans and provides that information in a standard format, allowing for easy search and meaningful comparison shopping. Third, the nature of shopping for health insurance is more similar to buying a house than hailing a taxi: purchasing decisions are few and far between, and there is significant money at stake in the transaction, and there

Finally, now has the budget behind it to make it work after substantial budget cuts under Trump. The Biden administration recently committed $50 million in spending to help market and promote Obamacare insurance options to eligible enrollees. The administration is also working to secure more “navigators,” human beings available to help walk enrollees through their options and the process to ensure they are paying the lowest price possible.  

Public vs. Private Run Marketplaces and Platforms, And What Can Work

With both state and federal public health insurance exchanges as an example, there are certainly instances where the government can play a role in public marketplace development: 

  1. There is a high-degree of information asymmetry between consumer and supplier
  2. The cost of a failed transaction (or poor quality service) is high
  3. There is significant utility provided to a large group of consumers by standardizing and simplifying the way options are presented 
  4. Purchasing decisions or information exchange needs are infrequent 

When these conditions are met, a government-run (or sponsored) platform may yield value. 

But for most other marketplace and platforms seeking to make commercial and information exchange more efficient, private capital is much better positioned to succeed. In healthcare, for instance, despite millions of taxpayer dollars invested into interoperability efforts, adoption and use remains low. While there are additional contributing factors for why this is the case, it is also true that most forms of health information exchange deal with frequent interactions between providers (and/or patients), different groups of providers and patients have different information needs, and standardization at too high a level renders information to any one constituent virtually meaningless.

Source link


Novartis reshuffles its wild cards; Tough sell for Biogen? Googling proteins; Ken Frazier’s new gig; and more – Endpoints News




Always remember just how risky it is to gamble big on small studies.

A little more than 4 years ago, Novartis reportedly put up a package worth up to $1 billion for the dry eye drug ECF843 after a small biotech called Lubris put it through its paces in a tiny study of 40 moderate to severe patients, tracking some statistically significant markers of efficacy.

By last fall, the program had risen up to become one of CEO Vas Narasimhan’s top “wild card” programs in line for a potential breakthrough year in 2021. These drugs were all considered high-risk, high-reward efforts. And in this case, risk won.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 112,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it’s free.

Source link

Continue Reading


Global Gig Economy and Sharing Economy Market 2021 Growth Factors | Strategic Analysis | Increasing Demand With Top Key Players




Gig Economy and Sharing Economy

The Gig Economy and Sharing Economy research provides a thorough and all-encompassing view of the global industry. The comprehensive research report includes essential data, as well as the market size and share of the global Gig Economy and Sharing Economy industry. Furthermore, the research report provides a clear description of elements influencing the development of the Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market, such as drivers, technological advancements, and current market conditions, among others. It also provides insight into the market’s past and expected future (market size in terms of revenue (in US$ Mn) and volume (thousand units)).

Furthermore, the study estimates the size of the Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market by product category, end-user applications, and leading main regions. A report is an important instrument for highlighting the growth and fruitfulness of the area and assisting in making critical and vital judgments.

Couchsurfing, Lyft, Uber, Door Dash, Airbnb, Uber, Postmates, GoGoGrandparent, BlaBlaCar, Airbnb, Upwork, Task Rabbit, Fiverr, Lyft, SilverNest, Zipcar, Rover is a key player in the Gig Economy and Sharing Economy industry.

Get Exclusive Sample Report + To Know the Impact of COVID-19 on this Industry

Various secondary sources are employed to diagnose and collect data for a comprehensive research of the Gig Economy and Sharing Economy industry. For acquiring and studying crucial information and verifying elements of the Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market, key sources include substantial estimations of industry professionals. Furthermore, the global Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market is segmented by type, application, and geography.

The report includes the company profile of Gig Economy and Sharing Economy, product descriptions, and production values, as well as statistical analysis. The study covers the worldwide Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market in its entirety, including its size, production, manufacturing value, loss/gain, Gig Economy and Sharing Economy supply/demand, and import/export. The market study is separated into sections to provide a comprehensive competitive analysis.

The Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market research then depicts the industry’s development patterns. It contains an examination of main resources, downstream applications, and current market trends for Gig Economy and Sharing Economy. Furthermore, before evaluating the advantages, the Gig Economy and Sharing Economy study develops some thorough plans for the current project of the Industry. In other words, the paper provides a comprehensive overview of the Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market, outlining all significant criteria.

The research also contains detailed information on the two most important Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market segments: {Gig Economy, Sharing Economy} and {Shared private car, Shared private residence, Independent contractor, Freelancers}.

Profit, prospective application rate, cost, net, development ratio, level of investments, production, and provision are all estimated in the Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market research report.

Impact Analysis of COVID-19:

The impact of COVID on market growth and development is well illustrated in this research for a better understanding of the Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market based on financial and industrial analyses. The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted a variety of markets, including the worldwide Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market. The dominant companies in the worldwide Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market, on the other hand, are adamant about adopting new tactics and seeking new finance resources in order to overcome the rising barriers to market expansion.

Request Pre and Post COVID-19 Impact Analysis on Gig Economy and Sharing Economy

The main goal of Gig Economy and Sharing Economy is to:

– To provide a global market overview for Gig Economy and Sharing Economy.
– To forecast and estimate the Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market based on several categories.
– To present a market size and forecast for the overall Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market connected to important areas in the approaching years.
– To research Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market dynamics that will effect the market over the forecast period, including as opportunities, threats, crucial elements, challenges, and current/future trends.
– To provide an in-depth analysis of all Gig Economy and Sharing Economy regions included in the study.
– To depict the industry’s top Gig Economy and Sharing Economy players, along with their SWOT analyses and Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market strategies.

Inquire To Know Additional List of Market Players Included, Request Here::

Why should you buy Gig Economy and Sharing Economy?

The report uncovers strategically important competition data and perceptions in order to establish unique R&D schemes. The research identifies Gig Economy and Sharing Economy surfacing players with valuable product information and establishes advantageous counter methods to give competitive advantages. Gig Economy and Sharing Economy is also discovering and organising many forms of research under progress. In addition, in the target analytics, it classifies the upcoming new Gig Economy and Sharing Economy players of partners. Furthermore, the Gig Economy and Sharing Economy report enlarges sensible potentials by comprehending key sectors of prominent businesses.

As a result of its comprehension of Gig Economy and Sharing Economy specifics and primitive analysis, it creates remedial norms for forthcoming initiatives. Overall, the Gig Economy and Sharing Economy research provides a thorough examination of the worldwide Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market, as well as important strategies employed by top Gig Economy and Sharing Economy industry competitors and other insights. As a result, the study assists newcomers in assessing the market’s impending events.

About Us

Market Research Store is a single destination for all types of industries, global, and regional reports. We feature large repository of latest industry reports and market statistics published by reputed private publishers and public organizations.Market Research Store is the comprehensive collection of market intelligence products and services available. Our vast database of reports enables our clients to benefit from expert insights on global industries, products, and market trends.

Our Research Specialists have thorough knowledge about offerings from different publishers and different reports on respective industries. Our enabled team will help you refine search parameters and get desired results at your fingertips. Apart from the published market research reports, we also provide customized study on any topic to meet the varied and niche requirements of our clients. Whether you are looking for new product trends, competitive analysis or study on existing or emerging markets, Market Research Store has best offerings and expertise to get the critical information for you. You can also choose the option to purchase full reports or sections from the report to match your specific requirements.

Source link

Continue Reading


DZS Debuts Latest Innovations including Cloud Analytics Demo and XCelerate by DZS 10 Gig Combo Access Solutions at Fiber Connect 2021




DZS Cloud Service Management Intelligence demonstration combines advanced connected premises and network operations analytics supported by an open, cloud native architecture

PLANO, Texas, July 23, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — DZS (NASDAQ: DZSI), a global leader in optical and packet-based mobile transport, broadband connectivity and software defined networking solutions, today announced plans to demonstrate its latest innovations at Fiber Connect 2021 Conference & Exhibition, taking place July 25-28, 2021 in Nashville, Tennessee. Visitors to DZS booth #215 will be able to see and interact with DZS hardware and software solutions from across the company’s technology pillars – Orchestration and Analytics, Mobile Transport, Broadband Connectivity, and Edge Access. Highlights include live demonstrations of DZS Cloud Service Management Intelligence, a first glimpse of the company’s big data analytics system with a cloud native architecture that monitors and provides advanced quality-of-service and issue resolution insights into the connected home correlated with access and aggregation networks. A full array of the recently announced DZS XCelerate line of 10 gig-class fiber access cards and systems will also be on display. The DZS Velocity, DZS Chronos, DZS Helix, and DZS Cloud solutions portfolios continue to expand, and the company is proud to be able share its innovations on the Fiber Connect 2021 Expo show floor.

In addition to the live product displays and demonstrations taking place at the DZS booth, Eric Wulfsberg, Senior Director, Product Line Management, Edge Access at DZS, will be presenting in person on Sunday July 25 at 3 pm at the Broadband Forum BASe Future of Fiber Technologies Workshop. As a Silver Sponsor of Fiber Connect 2021, DZS CMO Geoff Burke will be the featured speaker on Monday July 26 at 5:30 pm in the Expo Theater for a 20-minute presentation entitled “XCelerating into the Future with DZS”.

“Fiber Connect is a leading optical fiber business and technology event in the Americas that strategically convenes North American service providers, fiber overbuilders and WISPs to develop the communications industry of tomorrow,” said Andrew Bender, CTO of DZS. “We believe next generation broadband connectivity, mobile and edge transport, and software defined solutions and services are top-of-mind among the Fiber Connect audience; this aligns perfectly with where we as DZS have been focusing our innovation and development energy on a go-forward basis. Since Fiber Connect 2021 marks one of the first U.S. national shows in the communications industry to be back in-person since the COVID-19 pandemic changed the world, we are looking forward to meeting with and demonstrating our latest innovations for our customers, prospective customers and ecosystem partners in-person in Nashville.”

Visitors to the DZS booth will experience first-hand a range of the latest technology innovations:

  • DZS Cloud Analytics: At the center of the DZS booth, demonstrations of the new DZS Cloud analytics and orchestration solutions will show how service providers can optimize and automate their access and edge networks, reducing operational complexity to achieve cost-effective scale. DZS market-leading network orchestration and software automation solutions are gaining traction with service providers around the world and driving transformation to a software defined and automated network in an open and multi-vendor environment. DZS Cloud includes orchestration, access network management and advanced analytics, enabling service providers to efficiently operate their networks and detect issues proactively to avoid service impact.

  • Mobile Transport: The DZS Chronos mobile transport portfolio provides a full range of 5G-ready xHaul (fronthaul, midhaul and backhaul) solutions that are open, software-defined and proven and enable topologies and architectures for Open RAN and Virtual RAN approaches. The new O-series line of environmentally hardened optical transport products will be on display, including the MPX-9103 100G DWDM Muxponder and the modular TMS-1190 Optical Edge Transport Platform, optimized for high capacity and long-reach mobile xHaul scenarios. Also, on display will be the widely deployed C1216RO Open FrontHaul Gateway as well as M-series mobile backhaul products, including M3500 and M1500 cell-site switch / router platforms.

  • Broadband Access: The DZS Velocity Portfolio of broadband access systems, switches and routers, unified by the powerful Software Defined Network (SDN)-enabled operating system sdNOS, provides carriers with extraordinary flexibility with the latest fiber access technologies and software-centric operational models. DZS V-series modular chassis system, as well as new specialized compact form factor XGS-PON and 10 gig access solutions will be shown – all of which are part of the groundbreaking XCelerate by DZS line of 10 Gig solutions.

  • Connected Premises: The DZS Helix Edge Access solutions portfolio of feature-rich ONTs, smart gateways and home Wi-Fi management solutions for residences and enterprises will be on display, ready for emerging 5G, 10 gigabit, Wi-Fi 6-enabled networks. Armed with these intelligent access edge solutions complemented by DZS Cloud, service providers can move beyond traditional triple-play offerings to quickly and efficiently launch, operate, troubleshoot and optimized cutting edge residential and business services.

See you at the show! For more information visit

About DZS
DZS Inc. (NSDQ: DZSI) is a global leader of intelligent, packet-based mobile transport and broadband access converged edge solutions with more than 20 million products in-service with customers and alliance partners spanning more than 100 countries.

DZS, the DZS logo, and all DZS product names are trademarks of DZS Inc. Other brand and product names are trademarks of their respective holders. Specifications, products, and/or product names are all subject to change.

This press release contains forward-looking statements regarding future events and our future results that are subject to the safe harbors created under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements reflect the beliefs and assumptions of the Company’s management as of the date hereof. Words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “goal,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would,” variations of such words, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. The Company’s actual results could differ materially and adversely from those expressed in or contemplated by the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ include, but are not limited to, those risk factors contained in the Company’s SEC filings available at, including without limitation, the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and subsequent filings. In addition, additional or unforeseen affects from the COVID-19 pandemic and the global economic climate may give rise to or amplify many of these risks. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made. DZS undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements for any reason.

For further information see:
DZS on Twitter:
DZS on LinkedIn:

Press Inquiries:
McKenzie Hurst, Thatcher+Co.
Mobile: +1 408.888.6787

Source link

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2019