Connect with us

Companies

How a deal for gig workers fell apart

Published

on

Depending on who you ask, the death of a deal between business and labor groups to allow many gig workers to unionize can be tracked to a few different points in the final days of the 2021 state legislative session. A state lawmaker who opposed the deal said that a May 17 Bloomberg News story quoting the head of the Transport Workers Union celebrating the agreement, which would have given ride-hailing and delivery workers collective bargaining rights but stopped short of reclassifying them as employees, botched its rollout. Some proponents of the plan said that there just wasn’t enough time left in session to address objections to the controversial proposal, especially after state Sen. Jessica Ramos, chair of the labor committee, spoke out against it. Others pointed to the second to last week of session, when one of the major unions reversed its support. But many of the proposal’s harshest critics simply put its time of death at “on arrival.” 

The proposal in question never really arrived, at least not in the form of an introduced bill. When news broke in Bloomberg in mid-May that tech companies and labor unions were “nearing a deal” – before many workers’ groups had even heard about it – the broad strokes of the proposal were roughly agreed upon by the companies and unions. But even those groups expected it to undergo changes before making it to the Senate floor.

While state Sen. Diane Savino, who planned to sponsor the proposal, said in the final weeks of session that a bill would be introduced, it never was. “This is like the most contested piece of non-legislation ever,” said John Samuelsen, the international president of the TWU. Samuelsen was the one quoted praising the agreement in the Bloomberg story, even though he had only been brought into the fold weeks before. At the time Samuelsen spoke to Bloomberg, his lawyers were still working their way through the draft legislation the other groups at the negotiating table had given to him. Days later, after the bill draft leaked to the press and began to draw backlash from progressive lawmakers and workers’ advocacy groups, Samuelsen reversed course and said he wouldn’t support the plan.

The negative response was partially based on what critics said amounted to a rollback in gig workers’ rights: While the proposal would have granted collective bargaining rights, unemployment insurance and workers compensation to ride-hail drivers and delivery workers, those rights all came with asterisks. One provision restricted workers’ ability to strike or demonstrate against their employer. Opponents also said the proposal would have rolled back the limited wins gig workers already achieved at the local level, including a New York City rule establishing a minimum pay formula for drivers that takes into account how long they spend waiting for a ride, among other things. The draft bill would pay drivers only for “engaged time” – from when they accept a ride request to when they complete it. 

But while many of the deal’s opponents – such as the New York Taxi Workers Alliance, the National Employment Law Project and progressive lawmakers including Ramos – saw the proposal as a failure in its substance, the larger failure may have been the fact that it came as such a surprise to those who would be affected by it. “You’re going to get a poor product when you have a poor process,” Ramos told City & State a week after news of it broke. 

Both its proponents and critics say that the proposal failed because increasingly influential workers’ groups like Los Deliveristas Unidos, a group of mostly immigrant food delivery workers backed by the immigrant worker advocacy group Workers Justice Project, were not brought to the negotiating table. Despite leading grassroots organizing efforts among food delivery workers, organizing thousands in an April rally in Manhattan for better labor protections, Los Deliveristas Unidos – and groups including the New York Taxi Workers Alliance – first learned about the deal in that May 17 news story.

In the final days of session and those following, City & State spoke to the people who were involved in hashing out this compromise, and those who were left out, leading to another year of stalled action on granting gig workers more rights in Albany. Here’s what we know about what happened. 

Breaking news in Bloomberg

Tech companies and labor unions, overseen by the state AFL-CIO, have been working together on a compromise for months. Savino, who previously introduced failed legislation to allow gig workers to collectively bargain, said that she gave a directive in late 2020 to tech companies and labor, including the state AFL-CIO, to negotiate an agreement to grant gig workers more rights. The instruction echoed the idea of having these often-opposing groups negotiate a solution in a gig worker task force proposed by Gov. Andrew Cuomo in January 2020.

While some in labor had pushed for gig workers to be reclassified as employees, the gig platform companies have waged a fierce battle against that. Following a successful effort by gig companies in California last November to overturn legislation that would have reclassified workers, the message from Savino was to find an alternative approach in New York that would secure three things for gig workers: the right to organize, unemployment insurance and workers’ compensation insurance for workers injured on the job. As those negotiations began in earnest earlier this year, they have included Uber, Lyft, DoorDash and Instacart, and on the labor side, the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, and the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, overseen by the state AFL-CIO. RWDSU said they stepped away from the table to focus on other issues, and Samuelsen at TWU stepped in this May. The Machinists would presumably be in line to represent drivers, while the TWU would likely try to organize delivery workers.

But progress from those groups was slow this year, causing Savino to get impatient. “They were talking and talking and talking and talking and talking,” Savino, a Democrat who represents Staten Island and part of southern Brooklyn, recalled. “January, February: ‘Well we can’t do anything now, we’re working on the budget. We’ll get to you after the budget.’ And then the break comes and I say, ‘Hello? Tick tock people. We’re getting close to the end of session.’” On Thursday, May 20, Savino was given a draft of the legislation.

But before Savino had even seen that draft, news of it broke in Bloomberg. Samuelsen said in that story that despite typically being critical of striking compromises with companies, he would fully support this one. “I had every intention of staying away from it, and now after seeing how much it’ll advance gig workers, I’m fully supporting it,” he said. 

The draft legislation wouldn’t start to make the rounds publicly until a few days later, but the concept as reported in Bloomberg was quickly condemned. “Some unscrupulous leaders of the labor movement … are trying to cut a deal with gig bosses to lock New York State gig workers out of employee rights and protections and possibly preempt cities from passing stronger labor laws,” the New York Taxi Workers Alliance, a labor group representing taxi and ride-hail drivers, tweeted on May 18. 

The draft legislation started circulating a few days later. Though Savino herself had only seen the draft that week and hadn’t introduced a legislation, some of the critics appeared to perceive it as a finalized agreement that had to be stopped in its tracks. “I got people on Twitter asking me to withdraw the bill,” Savino recalled. “I’m like, ‘Withdraw a bill that doesn’t exist?’”

While Savino said that the leak of the draft bill was “detrimental” and “pushed people to their respective corners,” other proponents of the deal said that a leaked draft was actually a positive in terms of transparency in the legislative process. The problem was not the leak, but the fact that some worker groups were caught unawares.

“One guy and a bunch of companies in a room”

Those worker groups, in a depiction contested by the agreement’s proponents, characterized it as a backroom deal. “For a long time, Albany, they’d say it was three men in the room. Now it feels like one guy and a bunch of companies,” the Taxi Worker’s Alliance Executive Director Bhairavi Desai said.

Los Deliveristas Unidos complained that they and other workers were left out of the negotiating process. “LDU is opposed to any legislative proposal that is pre-negotiated without delivery workers’ input, and that directly impacts our industry, work conditions, and the well-being of our families,” the May 25 statement read, with just eight days left of session. 

Some proponents of the compromise between labor and tech companies dispute the notion that no workers were consulted, pointing to the involvement of the Independent Drivers Guild, an affiliate of the Machinists Union, which gave input, according to Brendan Sexton, the group’s executive director. The IDG functions as an advocacy group but also as a quasi-union for Uber, Lyft and other for-hire vehicle drivers. The guild, for example, offers help in securing drivers due process and remediation when they have been kicked off certain apps. On a June 2 call with Sexton and Tina Raveneau, a driver-organizer at IDG, Raveneau spoke in favor of the proposal. “All of us drivers knew about it, so we had a chance to give our opinions,” she told City & State. “This bill, I know many think it’s not perfect, but it’s a stepping stone.” The IDG, however, has faced criticisms for being aligned with Uber and receives funding from the ride-hail giant.

Other gig workers were not involved. Delivery workers who organize with the Deliveristas told outlets including The City and Mother Jones that the proposal was snuck “behind their backs” and that it was “unjust” that they weren’t informed of it. 

So how did a deal that amounted to a major shift in gig workers’ rights get hammered out without consulting key workers’ organizations? Several people familiar with the talks said that those who were negotiating on behalf of the companies believed that the unions were engaging organizations like Los Deliveristas Unidos. Samuelsen and Savino said they were also under the impression that the Deliveristas had been involved.

Instead, the delivery workers organization learned of the proposal when the Bloomberg story broke. “And they freaked the fuck out, which honestly, you can’t blame them,” said one Albany insider who asked not to be named because of their work with one of the parties involved. The Deliveristas said they were not even aware that there had been negotiations happening between tech companies and labor over the last year.

RWDSU declined to comment on whether they had any conversations with the Deliveristas about this proposal in the months before stepping away from the negotiations. The Machinists, who were involved in negotiating the deal from the start, did not respond to a request for comment. “I think there was a belief that the labor unions spoke for the workers, and honestly, there were plenty of workers the labor unions weren’t speaking for,” that insider said.

Losing the support of labor

On May 25, the same day that the Deliveristas released their statement, one of the deal’s key labor backers dropped out when Samuelsen announced that because of what he learned about the lack of worker input, particularly from the Deliveristas, the Transport Workers Union could no longer support the deal. “If the workers don’t want the bill, then we will continue to collaborate with them and perhaps advance a piece of legislation that they have direct input in,” Samuelsen told City & State at the time. 

Losing the TWU meant that, within organized labor, only the Machinists (and the IDG as their affiliate) were left supporting the deal. It became clear then that it wouldn’t have enough backing from labor to move forward in the final days of session. 

Even before the Deliveristas came out against the bill, one of the more powerful legislators on labor issues announced her opposition. On May 21, state Sen. Jessica Ramos, who chairs her chamber’s Committee on Labor, released a statement saying that she could not support legislation “crafted without uncompromised worker voices at the table.” 

While Savino said that she’d had conversations with Ramos as recently as late last year about gig workers’ rights generally, she said she didn’t talk to Ramos about the fact that there were negotiations happening between tech companies and labor unions.

That may have been a key error. “For a labor bill to have legitimacy in the state Legislature, I think it would need the backing of the (Senate) Labor chair,” Desai said. 

A scramble to save the deal

Savino tried to rescue the effort, meeting with the Deliveristas, Samuelsen and more in the last week of May to hear their concerns. An amended version of the draft bill leaked and circulated on Tuesday, June 1. A copy of that draft shared with City & State removed the provision explicitly prohibiting striking, picketing and boycotting by workers, but included language that would keep them from coercing others from ceasing to do business with gig companies. Critics said that that effectively kept the no-strike restriction in place, and called other changes to the draft tweaks of no substance.

Savino made a last ditch effort to get everyone together in a room on June 5, the Saturday before the last week of session, but failed to rally everyone. “It was clear that by the last weekend before session ended, that we just weren’t going to be able to put together a piece of legislation to address all their concerns in time.” Savino said that she did not work on any of the draft bills that circulated. By the end of session on June 10, a bill was never introduced. 

There’s a fundamental break between lawmakers and labor groups who believe that securing gig workers more rights in increments – even if imperfect – should be done immediately, and those who believe that gig companies will use any compromise to undermine efforts to treat those workers as actual employees. In the days following the end of session, the proposal’s opponents celebrated its death, saying that no progress in this session was better than a deal that would have rolled back their rights, including by preempting existing minimum-wage rules for drivers. Those who hoped to pass it are frustrated by their victory dances. “There are hundreds of thousands of workers out there who are at risk every day,” Savino said last week. “So people can be smug and self satisfied about what they think they did to derail what could have been a serious discussion about helping workers. And I’d just like to remind them all that it’s a long way down from that high horse they climbed up on.” Savino declined to be more specific about who she was talking about. 



Source link

Companies

Novartis reshuffles its wild cards; Tough sell for Biogen? Googling proteins; Ken Frazier’s new gig; and more – Endpoints News

Published

on

By

Always remember just how risky it is to gamble big on small studies.

A little more than 4 years ago, Novartis reportedly put up a package worth up to $1 billion for the dry eye drug ECF843 after a small biotech called Lubris put it through its paces in a tiny study of 40 moderate to severe patients, tracking some statistically significant markers of efficacy.

By last fall, the program had risen up to become one of CEO Vas Narasimhan’s top “wild card” programs in line for a potential breakthrough year in 2021. These drugs were all considered high-risk, high-reward efforts. And in this case, risk won.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 112,600+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it’s free.


Source link

Continue Reading

Companies

Global Gig Economy and Sharing Economy Market 2021 Growth Factors | Strategic Analysis | Increasing Demand With Top Key Players

Published

on

By

Gig Economy and Sharing Economy

The Gig Economy and Sharing Economy research provides a thorough and all-encompassing view of the global industry. The comprehensive research report includes essential data, as well as the market size and share of the global Gig Economy and Sharing Economy industry. Furthermore, the research report provides a clear description of elements influencing the development of the Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market, such as drivers, technological advancements, and current market conditions, among others. It also provides insight into the market’s past and expected future (market size in terms of revenue (in US$ Mn) and volume (thousand units)).

Furthermore, the study estimates the size of the Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market by product category, end-user applications, and leading main regions. A report is an important instrument for highlighting the growth and fruitfulness of the area and assisting in making critical and vital judgments.

Couchsurfing, Lyft, Uber, Door Dash, Airbnb, Uber, Postmates, GoGoGrandparent, BlaBlaCar, Airbnb, Upwork, Task Rabbit, Fiverr, Lyft, SilverNest, Zipcar, Rover is a key player in the Gig Economy and Sharing Economy industry.

Get Exclusive Sample Report + To Know the Impact of COVID-19 on this Industryhttps://www.marketresearchstore.com/sample/gig-economy-and-sharing-economy-market-777334

Various secondary sources are employed to diagnose and collect data for a comprehensive research of the Gig Economy and Sharing Economy industry. For acquiring and studying crucial information and verifying elements of the Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market, key sources include substantial estimations of industry professionals. Furthermore, the global Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market is segmented by type, application, and geography.

The report includes the company profile of Gig Economy and Sharing Economy, product descriptions, and production values, as well as statistical analysis. The study covers the worldwide Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market in its entirety, including its size, production, manufacturing value, loss/gain, Gig Economy and Sharing Economy supply/demand, and import/export. The market study is separated into sections to provide a comprehensive competitive analysis.

The Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market research then depicts the industry’s development patterns. It contains an examination of main resources, downstream applications, and current market trends for Gig Economy and Sharing Economy. Furthermore, before evaluating the advantages, the Gig Economy and Sharing Economy study develops some thorough plans for the current project of the Industry. In other words, the paper provides a comprehensive overview of the Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market, outlining all significant criteria.

The research also contains detailed information on the two most important Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market segments: {Gig Economy, Sharing Economy} and {Shared private car, Shared private residence, Independent contractor, Freelancers}.

Profit, prospective application rate, cost, net, development ratio, level of investments, production, and provision are all estimated in the Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market research report.

Impact Analysis of COVID-19:

The impact of COVID on market growth and development is well illustrated in this research for a better understanding of the Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market based on financial and industrial analyses. The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted a variety of markets, including the worldwide Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market. The dominant companies in the worldwide Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market, on the other hand, are adamant about adopting new tactics and seeking new finance resources in order to overcome the rising barriers to market expansion.

Request Pre and Post COVID-19 Impact Analysis on Gig Economy and Sharing Economyhttps://www.marketresearchstore.com/sample/gig-economy-and-sharing-economy-market-777334

The main goal of Gig Economy and Sharing Economy is to:

– To provide a global market overview for Gig Economy and Sharing Economy.
– To forecast and estimate the Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market based on several categories.
– To present a market size and forecast for the overall Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market connected to important areas in the approaching years.
– To research Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market dynamics that will effect the market over the forecast period, including as opportunities, threats, crucial elements, challenges, and current/future trends.
– To provide an in-depth analysis of all Gig Economy and Sharing Economy regions included in the study.
– To depict the industry’s top Gig Economy and Sharing Economy players, along with their SWOT analyses and Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market strategies.

Inquire To Know Additional List of Market Players Included, Request Here:: https://www.marketresearchstore.com/inquiry/gig-economy-and-sharing-economy-market-777334

Why should you buy Gig Economy and Sharing Economy?

The report uncovers strategically important competition data and perceptions in order to establish unique R&D schemes. The research identifies Gig Economy and Sharing Economy surfacing players with valuable product information and establishes advantageous counter methods to give competitive advantages. Gig Economy and Sharing Economy is also discovering and organising many forms of research under progress. In addition, in the target analytics, it classifies the upcoming new Gig Economy and Sharing Economy players of partners. Furthermore, the Gig Economy and Sharing Economy report enlarges sensible potentials by comprehending key sectors of prominent businesses.

As a result of its comprehension of Gig Economy and Sharing Economy specifics and primitive analysis, it creates remedial norms for forthcoming initiatives. Overall, the Gig Economy and Sharing Economy research provides a thorough examination of the worldwide Gig Economy and Sharing Economy market, as well as important strategies employed by top Gig Economy and Sharing Economy industry competitors and other insights. As a result, the study assists newcomers in assessing the market’s impending events.

About Us

Market Research Store is a single destination for all types of industries, global, and regional reports. We feature large repository of latest industry reports and market statistics published by reputed private publishers and public organizations.Market Research Store is the comprehensive collection of market intelligence products and services available. Our vast database of reports enables our clients to benefit from expert insights on global industries, products, and market trends.

Our Research Specialists have thorough knowledge about offerings from different publishers and different reports on respective industries. Our enabled team will help you refine search parameters and get desired results at your fingertips. Apart from the published market research reports, we also provide customized study on any topic to meet the varied and niche requirements of our clients. Whether you are looking for new product trends, competitive analysis or study on existing or emerging markets, Market Research Store has best offerings and expertise to get the critical information for you. You can also choose the option to purchase full reports or sections from the report to match your specific requirements.

https://neighborwebsj.com/

Source link

Continue Reading

Companies

DZS Debuts Latest Innovations including Cloud Analytics Demo and XCelerate by DZS 10 Gig Combo Access Solutions at Fiber Connect 2021

Published

on

By

DZS Cloud Service Management Intelligence demonstration combines advanced connected premises and network operations analytics supported by an open, cloud native architecture

PLANO, Texas, July 23, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — DZS (NASDAQ: DZSI), a global leader in optical and packet-based mobile transport, broadband connectivity and software defined networking solutions, today announced plans to demonstrate its latest innovations at Fiber Connect 2021 Conference & Exhibition, taking place July 25-28, 2021 in Nashville, Tennessee. Visitors to DZS booth #215 will be able to see and interact with DZS hardware and software solutions from across the company’s technology pillars – Orchestration and Analytics, Mobile Transport, Broadband Connectivity, and Edge Access. Highlights include live demonstrations of DZS Cloud Service Management Intelligence, a first glimpse of the company’s big data analytics system with a cloud native architecture that monitors and provides advanced quality-of-service and issue resolution insights into the connected home correlated with access and aggregation networks. A full array of the recently announced DZS XCelerate line of 10 gig-class fiber access cards and systems will also be on display. The DZS Velocity, DZS Chronos, DZS Helix, and DZS Cloud solutions portfolios continue to expand, and the company is proud to be able share its innovations on the Fiber Connect 2021 Expo show floor.

In addition to the live product displays and demonstrations taking place at the DZS booth, Eric Wulfsberg, Senior Director, Product Line Management, Edge Access at DZS, will be presenting in person on Sunday July 25 at 3 pm at the Broadband Forum BASe Future of Fiber Technologies Workshop. As a Silver Sponsor of Fiber Connect 2021, DZS CMO Geoff Burke will be the featured speaker on Monday July 26 at 5:30 pm in the Expo Theater for a 20-minute presentation entitled “XCelerating into the Future with DZS”.

“Fiber Connect is a leading optical fiber business and technology event in the Americas that strategically convenes North American service providers, fiber overbuilders and WISPs to develop the communications industry of tomorrow,” said Andrew Bender, CTO of DZS. “We believe next generation broadband connectivity, mobile and edge transport, and software defined solutions and services are top-of-mind among the Fiber Connect audience; this aligns perfectly with where we as DZS have been focusing our innovation and development energy on a go-forward basis. Since Fiber Connect 2021 marks one of the first U.S. national shows in the communications industry to be back in-person since the COVID-19 pandemic changed the world, we are looking forward to meeting with and demonstrating our latest innovations for our customers, prospective customers and ecosystem partners in-person in Nashville.”

Visitors to the DZS booth will experience first-hand a range of the latest technology innovations:

  • DZS Cloud Analytics: At the center of the DZS booth, demonstrations of the new DZS Cloud analytics and orchestration solutions will show how service providers can optimize and automate their access and edge networks, reducing operational complexity to achieve cost-effective scale. DZS market-leading network orchestration and software automation solutions are gaining traction with service providers around the world and driving transformation to a software defined and automated network in an open and multi-vendor environment. DZS Cloud includes orchestration, access network management and advanced analytics, enabling service providers to efficiently operate their networks and detect issues proactively to avoid service impact.

  • Mobile Transport: The DZS Chronos mobile transport portfolio provides a full range of 5G-ready xHaul (fronthaul, midhaul and backhaul) solutions that are open, software-defined and proven and enable topologies and architectures for Open RAN and Virtual RAN approaches. The new O-series line of environmentally hardened optical transport products will be on display, including the MPX-9103 100G DWDM Muxponder and the modular TMS-1190 Optical Edge Transport Platform, optimized for high capacity and long-reach mobile xHaul scenarios. Also, on display will be the widely deployed C1216RO Open FrontHaul Gateway as well as M-series mobile backhaul products, including M3500 and M1500 cell-site switch / router platforms.

  • Broadband Access: The DZS Velocity Portfolio of broadband access systems, switches and routers, unified by the powerful Software Defined Network (SDN)-enabled operating system sdNOS, provides carriers with extraordinary flexibility with the latest fiber access technologies and software-centric operational models. DZS V-series modular chassis system, as well as new specialized compact form factor XGS-PON and 10 gig access solutions will be shown – all of which are part of the groundbreaking XCelerate by DZS line of 10 Gig solutions.

  • Connected Premises: The DZS Helix Edge Access solutions portfolio of feature-rich ONTs, smart gateways and home Wi-Fi management solutions for residences and enterprises will be on display, ready for emerging 5G, 10 gigabit, Wi-Fi 6-enabled networks. Armed with these intelligent access edge solutions complemented by DZS Cloud, service providers can move beyond traditional triple-play offerings to quickly and efficiently launch, operate, troubleshoot and optimized cutting edge residential and business services.

See you at the show! For more information visit www.DZSi.com.

About DZS
DZS Inc. (NSDQ: DZSI) is a global leader of intelligent, packet-based mobile transport and broadband access converged edge solutions with more than 20 million products in-service with customers and alliance partners spanning more than 100 countries.

DZS, the DZS logo, and all DZS product names are trademarks of DZS Inc. Other brand and product names are trademarks of their respective holders. Specifications, products, and/or product names are all subject to change.

This press release contains forward-looking statements regarding future events and our future results that are subject to the safe harbors created under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements reflect the beliefs and assumptions of the Company’s management as of the date hereof. Words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “goal,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would,” variations of such words, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. The Company’s actual results could differ materially and adversely from those expressed in or contemplated by the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ include, but are not limited to, those risk factors contained in the Company’s SEC filings available at www.sec.gov, including without limitation, the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and subsequent filings. In addition, additional or unforeseen affects from the COVID-19 pandemic and the global economic climate may give rise to or amplify many of these risks. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made. DZS undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements for any reason.

For further information see: www.DZSi.com.
DZS on Twitter: https://twitter.com/dzs_innovation
DZS on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/DZSi/

Press Inquiries:
McKenzie Hurst, Thatcher+Co.
Mobile: +1 408.888.6787
Email: mhurst@thatcherandco.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2019 Gigger.news.